From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE3513B2FFE for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2026 20:31:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785875463; cv=none; b=mheg5wJ960K+QQxNlDtXsaxICbJ5YRTUSJ1a4HiL74r+YGd/93XQRImnb1LYKrEDg0773iayWVvOf6GB3eM8OE1NOo+FWFidMVQz2qRG8DeQ6xYBsr+sa+47t/zOSNRnpRfVWfT11y0mNDUIIPSdoezfSvb/Hgj/Yjq1htB+3ps= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785875463; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FEVcsLwCi13+tQSy5pOPAi3kFTUi4iMbxrJ6/313e+k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qkz4vK4MCthwXVQVg7/bBH6ZVIzdmFYq5Ix6Mfb0pXnrRenVqJ1zsqhF1L4dx1imAFucyZvrwtS8b2jpmhbusEU7+gDCnb8JQRNUEQX4UXgI6yKaXBkcy1bf0EZG2CPESj1bC2TLBMfhwzjoaQihXEAZsnnhOVP4INXnk6M/xgQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=FmOEo6mC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="FmOEo6mC" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=FEVc sLwCi13+tQSy5pOPAi3kFTUi4iMbxrJ6/313e+k=; b=FmOEo6mCQ3DcbiVSTcLZ AYrIaxf/L/NI6wCVFBdVPJsPK55pOWaYF5PSKF91DefbWUzuShhHr1hrhFNBGHmS AhmP8hoXig5Ja+gOvaXkyCp+lIJ6wj/teXDtU7hNcE2ySAX7MKw4iwIGEEQLspLH L9u/cGFtzMxv9ohjl0IvfyNipxskcXgi1eu+sVGZMzxNz1hQFP1ufOUKe27C1PvO ysrl6CWDo+Vc8UHRb/WhbO0pcAXuWOJX2KOau+qALlQ0oQ8h1FGLYrfDerrE69TA AuvJRj5VE+RsgvgvSaU5/zrKo7lk0TlDfwZgk2Tab3SyQMnqK7d4KNGD80glOMvG 6g== Received: (qmail 3520273 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2026 22:30:59 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 4 Aug 2026 22:30:59 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@8VRgiD5YVMsujnsQ Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 22:30:59 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: "Herve Codina (Schneider Electric)" Cc: Daniel Lezcano , Thomas Gleixner , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Pascal Eberhard , Miquel Raynal , Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] ARM: dts: r9a06g032: Add support for timers Message-ID: References: <20260721082952.215691-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com> <20260721082952.215691-4-herve.codina@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aoFCxAs525i516L1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260721082952.215691-4-herve.codina@bootlin.com> --aoFCxAs525i516L1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 10:29:49AM +0200, Herve Codina (Schneider Electric)= wrote: > In the Renesas RZ/N1 SoCs family, two timers block are available. >=20 > Each block contains 8 timers composed of 6 16-bits timers and 2 32-bits > timers. >=20 > Each timer has its own interrupt line. >=20 > Describe those timers blocks. >=20 Nits: Maybe delete the empty lines and write all this in one paragraph? > Signed-off-by: Herve Codina (Schneider Electric) > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang Tested-by: Wolfram Sang Same testing as in patch 2, same comment about 0x400 reg-size as in patch 1. --aoFCxAs525i516L1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmpyTAMACgkQFA3kzBSg KbaSUBAAoCiV7bvLt69Riujk0VxlkiX/AXRHP0Mog7A18gBhB+qoUgcZFE5spHln 05Xh9POGu6HS0vsY+8GlBkg+68J30753gmJ/I4zWA3KBrtHZ6Fz50SUsX8ZWJzfH 0sOAStzCn+PsRJjJ5BwAL/SIq6hPpc3CZEKzaduzwZQ3VSFuxAjO2W5GH6I9+5qN iNgfF0kCUEhd5mfatzaYvimVLGdgrW4fTrCw6zRmpU8edCas/61Hdzw4oDLjEc2q nKGfuw1qo5VzW2F/gYo5ZeJQ5YYKx5P6P60U56LSmimgQcpAQqpwUFqectpf2ZwW 14sdEblb3hWTtSMThPqDfJBKNCDNPWO/TVGCrf4iqUeNC8ZKFP3BfuLZryM1Ln3C HDU3NrXzUIJtjxJSA0DPZonywCVJHKEEzFPjGJvtA7h8+NJJnwZSDFaM35nF9NJw vA/S3Cat6rmDZidW+p7rcGOJJM0uO2iOjHx7RHvI4QXsS7++zUekSUKUY9oSeqvk Ykr2DA5/lEhZpO3i3h2jAwRX25F1IckOY3yEsiaCEeUISVeXzjDAB+vLOEeKHrYV JptdI9Ppnhy4kuJMTSSJoYI5lkYf0/vtQDWU2Si96uRFNckNOQHrubovL/hmCphO 4uWwvVROYwPOZr+GAANdUALR1tK5uP+0MgFm5h+QpB5Q+a/KlaI= =+F3g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aoFCxAs525i516L1--