From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Jishnu Prakash <jishnu.prakash@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Kamal Wadhwa <kamal.wadhwa@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Saikiran <bjsaikiran@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Add support for regulator-off-on-delay-us
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2026 18:12:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <asZvhvK5kB9DyemI@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001-regulator-off-on-delay-v4-2-258ba9612da8@oss.qualcomm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 519 bytes --]
On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 06:16:29PM +0530, Jishnu Prakash wrote:
> Add support for parsing the 'regulator-off-on-delay-us' property from
> the device tree to enforce this physical constraint.
>
> Signed-off-by: Saikiran <bjsaikiran@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jishnu Prakash <jishnu.prakash@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c | 3 +++
Since this is a generic property I would expect it to be parsed by the
regulator core, is there some reason for making it driver specific?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-07 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 12:46 [PATCH v4 0/4] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Add support for off-on-delay and debounce-delay Jishnu Prakash
2026-10-01 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] regulator: dt-bindings: Add 'regulator-off-on-delay-us' property Jishnu Prakash
2026-10-07 20:36 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-10-01 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Add support for regulator-off-on-delay-us Jishnu Prakash
2026-10-07 16:12 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2026-10-01 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] regulator: dt-bindings: qcom,rpmh-regulator: Add debounce delay property Jishnu Prakash
2026-10-07 20:37 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-10-01 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Add debounce delay before disabling regulator Jishnu Prakash
2026-10-01 13:05 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=asZvhvK5kB9DyemI@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=bjsaikiran@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jishnu.prakash@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=kamal.wadhwa@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox