From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1B494F4D0C for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2026 18:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791485219; cv=none; b=US226TtfJcGgaPwh9di8vMh6KFmlf/84cEG3DE3BGSz3/3qMD7t/eHJfM794B3tELtqEIm/Jjo1lmqG7wg8PWuYVDlaJm5CFziJ9rx1t8A4A8hzQv42x3/Qs4wbjbKm4BOu0TES3g3e+5SqpMu/S1uFtiOFQ7S9hZtFVs7Cwmog= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791485219; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WqUMFMPWZ746lMssxYdDiHwYphMtVzEwwCmluHImrxE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lklS2oRTKmEDmAAY1YRi0qA26/Cbah1jB7rvrZ1IZ1A3xHY6DOFARh4J9JCpAtlOey9LcxYPzbvSqPqB5L6zcH+H2Ciyb9cNqsyB83yb66pS5/FWE03WYIpQ5WuKrMcfMskC8DRkMX8vpifFrgQUUuyiy347XygZdS3PkdHcFTI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=fym3bOV5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="fym3bOV5" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=WqUM FMPWZ746lMssxYdDiHwYphMtVzEwwCmluHImrxE=; b=fym3bOV5SNdgJdg5WnnA 3R4Aw8nE/L3VuD1g9ikUnccSIC6ox0UVfUCFJ5kmsoSVvpKMwunqNy0bHw/I4aRA fJeqyXyFbBVYyUbnzu5FpCVqdmLkZSnoGVze+jDgIhOinwupAKs5CmQpwscB2f8y PhRSv/vH1xBs9aPkYfJoCOCyMrW3eO6bFRbNKeojAkUOwPdFti8yoGTw/pSsWqzs U6NW2lBZaBGCcHqY+Gm41YTQLsT4YFhTvEDAa4VaegmdHPU/LhNOBcuIKcFofUcs WO3U49iXOasp8EjqKck8UD6MOiiq2xNDmCxExM3vBXPwIx3GWPjglt4posoM4JtB Og== Received: (qmail 862361 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2026 20:40:07 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 8 Oct 2026 20:40:07 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@YqeNj1hdwLXDesiu Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 20:40:07 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Vinod Koul Cc: Conor Dooley , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Frank Li , Geert Uytterhoeven , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Magnus Damm , Rob Herring , Yoshihiro Shimoda Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] dmaengine: sh: rcar-dmac: add R-Car Gen5 X5H support Message-ID: References: <20260909094009.2167-6-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fjv2SOTvqNyKNWTR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260909094009.2167-6-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> --fjv2SOTvqNyKNWTR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 11:40:09AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Here is a small series with the needed driver updates to support R-Car > Gen5 and X5H for the SYSC-DMAC. Details are in the patch descriptions, > but it is all small stuff. >=20 > It has been tested on an Ironhide board (X5H) and a SparrowHawk (V4H) > for regression testing. The testing branch can be found here: >=20 > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git renesas/x5h/i= 2c-experimental >=20 > The patches here are based on linux-next as of 20260908. DT checks have > also been passed. >=20 > Looking forward to comments or approval! Every patch reviewed and tagged twice (thank you, guys!), no complaints =66rom Sashiko even - can we have this in 7.4 pretty please? --fjv2SOTvqNyKNWTR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmrH44YACgkQFA3kzBSg KbYuPQ/+M5/jRv3uKEzc2vj5XCf0ehBO4E/vr01TuDrEhOAu6EnIyQKMUcTiSSEA +6jv9iTq5GIK7bKBaQZ9MwuYe5Ed46CLbywxV4qErtFPD/Cr8p+KDjvFul+gu+cI Yvvy3PJmz2k0zE4VWZqR+8dnBykNP3CRhvc2+yKO1YwiES+nfATAYfAUaxRiBqNV sfDF7Q+Ct5DPAB3j10pJufKdTDoYwCJ3CFCb07BIkZ8YHYCyLqtxsx4HAvap59SL KrPeB/Z1xYt6SMyiGON69L2zWZS/VrQtM7ZUXgvnRPjugC8tLx+qpU69wjl8tppV 8sRcXUrso0IguwqcbTKZ5tXDTEkJVZS85uMLBXF2RtMrvI4NLgh5vRnI1urjQV/I Z+7/A5aJfoVABS6R6iLEw2KVGMAN51WU5WTRmpMzWNoAxfmVzH12z89TsAKf22ij FKGXCQ7AZFVXJZXjVE170Qq3GqGZdVNPR6rrzmPq7N2jolCUYcjHEPIRMOG8hIoV h+TtRxNXwacskIg1FC7UPMspFXezoJkuy//6HaHBayAZerST/DxrCurmr4+cO/NM ZSVNtU4jXPz8/eyxFWnIBsdx7RwI1WzFIwIjbIXs0UMyPL69fI2m0iLBCW+Jg6qZ IFeDE/QCRPv/ikiWAFpInPqiRSeVftQZInLKPD05HCNmSMT3nWw= =/9FF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fjv2SOTvqNyKNWTR--