From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: rodrigo.alencar@analog.com
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux@analog.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
"Jonathan Cameron" <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Olivier Moysan" <olivier.moysan@foss.st.com>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel.org>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Shuah Khan" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] iio: backend: add devm_iio_backend_get_optional()
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 21:41:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <atEeZPOLASHAcnjF@ashevche-desk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015-ad9910-backend-support-v1-2-3c21648c8e26@analog.com>
On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 01:49:42PM -0300, Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay wrote:
> Frontend devices might not need a backend driver to rely on. An IIO device
> that supports backends can behave differently when they are not available
> and that should be acceptable. Such parts may provide basic functionality
> solely using the control interface (SPI for instance), being able to have
> extended features when a backend is present.
>
> Add devm_iio_backend_get_optional(), which returns NULL when the backend
> is not described in firmware, i.e., when the io-backends property is not
> present or, for a named lookup, when the name is not listed in the
> io-backend-names property. Other errors, such as probe deferral, are
> still returned.
>
> To make that possible, a named lookup that does not match any entry of
> io-backend-names now fails with -ENOENT, the same error returned when the
> io-backends reference is missing. Also, the missing reference is no longer
> logged as an error, leaving that to the caller.
...
> struct fwnode_handle *fwnode_back __free(fwnode_handle) =
> fwnode_find_reference(fwnode, "io-backends", index);
> - if (IS_ERR(fwnode_back))
> + if (IS_ERR(fwnode_back)) {
> + /* not described in firmware, let the caller decide what to do */
> + if (PTR_ERR(fwnode_back) == -ENOENT)
> + return ERR_CAST(fwnode_back);
> +
> return dev_err_cast_probe(dev, fwnode_back,
> "Cannot get Firmware reference\n");
> + }
Simpler to do is just to add
/* not described in firmware, let the caller decide what to do */
if (PTR_ERR(fwnode_back) == -ENOENT)
return ERR_CAST(fwnode_back);
just before IS_ERR() check.
...
> ret = device_property_match_string(dev, "io-backend-names", name);
> + if (ret == -EINVAL || ret == -ENODATA)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
No. Please, use device_property_present() instead.
> if (ret < 0)
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 16:49 [PATCH 00/10] iio: frequency: ad9910: add IIO backend support Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 16:49 ` [PATCH 01/10] iio: frequency: ad9910: powerdown fix Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 16:49 ` [PATCH 02/10] iio: backend: add devm_iio_backend_get_optional() Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 18:41 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2026-10-15 16:49 ` [PATCH 03/10] dt-bindings: iio: frequency: add adi,ad9910-axi-backend Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 18:59 ` Conor Dooley
2026-10-15 16:49 ` [PATCH 04/10] dt-bindings: iio: frequency: ad9910: add io-backends property Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 19:00 ` Conor Dooley
2026-10-15 16:49 ` [PATCH 05/10] iio: frequency: ad9910: move channel indexes into a shared header Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 16:49 ` [PATCH 06/10] iio: frequency: ad9910: add axi backend driver Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 16:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 16:49 ` [PATCH 07/10] iio: frequency: ad9910: support drctl control Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 16:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 16:49 ` [PATCH 08/10] iio: frequency: ad9910: support iio backend Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 17:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 16:49 ` [PATCH 09/10] iio: ABI: add integration_time for output channels Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 18:38 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-15 16:49 ` [PATCH 10/10] docs: iio: ad9910: document DRCTL pin control Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=atEeZPOLASHAcnjF@ashevche-desk.local \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@analog.com \
--cc=olivier.moysan@foss.st.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo.alencar@analog.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ukleinek@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox