Re: Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: mmc: dwcmshc-sdhci: Fix resets array validation

["Huan He" <hehuan1@eswincomputing.com>]

> > The binding defines tuple-style reset-names items for some
> > compatibles, which implicitly enforces a fixed array length
> > via JSON Schema.
> > 
> > Defining global maxItems for resets and reset-names causes these
> > constraints to be intersected via allOf, resulting in an effective
> > minItems equal to the global maxItems. This leads to dtbs_check
> > failures reporting reset arrays as too short, even when the DTS
> > provides the correct number of entries.
> > 
> > Remove the global maxItems constraints and let the per-compatible
> > schema branches define the required reset array sizes explicitly.
> > 
> > Fixes: 30009a21f257 ("dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmshc: Add Eswin EIC7700")
> > Signed-off-by: Pritesh Patel <pritesh.patel@einfochips.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Huan He <hehuan1@eswincomputing.com>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml         | 6 ------
> >  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml
> > index 7e7c55dc2440..8af55a53b569 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml
> > @@ -49,12 +49,6 @@ properties:
> >    power-domains:
> >      maxItems: 1
> >  
> > -  resets:
> > -    maxItems: 5
> > -
> > -  reset-names:
> > -    maxItems: 5
> 
> No, add 'minItems' that covers the whole range needed.

Thank you very much for taking the time to review the patch and for your
valuable feedback.

I have checked other vendors in the kernel that use the resets property.
The minimum number in actual use is 4 (Eswin uses 4, others use 5).

Is it reasonable to add "minItems: 1"?

Best regards,
Huan He