From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D786EC77B7D for ; Fri, 5 May 2023 10:31:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231406AbjEEKb6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 May 2023 06:31:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40666 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231359AbjEEKb5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 May 2023 06:31:57 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com (mail-ed1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2D0618908 for ; Fri, 5 May 2023 03:31:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-50bc25f0c7dso3054799a12.3 for ; Fri, 05 May 2023 03:31:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1683282714; x=1685874714; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Tss2iYAogsWUkj4oYWrGVmAbKaoB0zM9wE54WqqKd0Y=; b=tNSLEHALkywvpQv1FwYipENAvoPjczA7Bxx9bEuVPexutY+1UE6shZWOfe6kxdOOx5 NQhDYrsjGsweQxlbK/FNWZ0+G8/OtTI5nDyyp5kcxr1qEUW1+3Ddzs7JSliBN49Gj4lT ZgzYPu1u/GpfxnPcQ19UEjA5bWdBrPUpZMQqy75M/1a4oQmSUdydgQfClCWE7idFvvP1 Ib0KLpn11BbAw6m5k9hgP2KTmWXZ1B62LdU0tkzWK/BYMvvPXRNw2PRa7ESEfpglOz2t Zv1pWH4qxSKjyFgBv0fvQ/+UrS9TJd+u9AKYwk952IllAO8MwF6cY3KcqTEEcSv8Yl+H IEnw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683282714; x=1685874714; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Tss2iYAogsWUkj4oYWrGVmAbKaoB0zM9wE54WqqKd0Y=; b=Jwp9i6KDz2K2/ZDhpvOHQOh7FL7+iPRUnXJ3K2upMoM7EWtRe+FNRshmfJ52zpZasT PXHEXFDrDI1DqFfo8EWHVwTkrrz5+gB/tD3rGgfP0WfZ7JwnRyV99Fsnxds1QmK1J/N3 jiXSRSzhiArJZa+jkOzS+q/VU43Ch7J9DAIYCG3ywrIyrYGNkDjIGOZi7qrXYsy1GxbZ l/t2Mo8g7az4I9AoMSd0M+SndZpb4H5TXRTsp0zQPCGKFiyG7z2S+PAVVWKuUmr70/Ip di4ihVpLryZlUWZoGjhM6jfV/9WEWQyAH1Mr1mGMXp5Ptr/X92JI6IhYQxndOKjuNlmq 2NGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDy0CHgtM0wfSPHrSe5ZAwhkfk3pCsnXabYX35GbTQnHfrm7osUw fpuoZN3YHNrdAifbpgmnK8OvjA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6Aww/tkHL01E2blbKoNpK2dQxvdbFSq2DqZgWwrWJths3LOb5cIJUBfPMQ90i6K+u007ymwg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d550:b0:94e:ffab:296a with SMTP id cr16-20020a170906d55000b0094effab296amr851246ejc.73.1683282714213; Fri, 05 May 2023 03:31:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2a02:810d:15c0:828:52e:24ce:bbc1:127d? ([2a02:810d:15c0:828:52e:24ce:bbc1:127d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bz6-20020a1709070aa600b0095850aef138sm763402ejc.6.2023.05.05.03.31.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 May 2023 03:31:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 12:31:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.1 Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 1/2 v5] dt-bindings: watchdog: marvell GTI system watchdog driver Content-Language: en-US To: Bharat Bhushan , "wim@linux-watchdog.org" , "linux@roeck-us.net" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org" , "linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" References: <20230503121016.6093-1-bbhushan2@marvell.com> <9911bb17-e8f7-b552-7056-a26b3194c416@linaro.org> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 05/05/2023 09:17, Bharat Bhushan wrote: >> Same story every time... and was discussed many, many times on the lists. >> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- >> 3A__elixir.bootlin.com_linux_v6.1- >> 2Drc1_source_Documentation_devicetree_bindings_writing-2Dbindings.rst- >> 23L42&d=DwICaQ&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=PAAlWswPe7d8gHlGbCLmy >> 2YezyK7O3Hv_t2heGnouBw&m=3aeejmHQ5C8TyLM5odlaq6KnLYHt4PhpJp70FQa >> qbNf7w15KFHA3fmeDR2V-en4m&s=FKeW5tpOG- >> CJoV_JKuqTa0k_tRrYWAQZG1UfqlW3c74&e= >> >> You need anyway SoC specific compatibles. Once you add proper compatibles, >> you will see that property is not needed. > > Looks odd to add N number of compatible for N socs belong to one class of soc, but anyways will do. Why this is odd? How does it differ from other SoCs? Best regards, Krzysztof