devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
To: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@ti.com>,
	lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, aaro.koskinen@iki.fi,
	andreas@kemnade.info, khilman@baylibre.com, tony@atomide.com,
	jerome.neanne@baylibre.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: m-leonard@ti.com, praneeth@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 7/7] regulator: tps65215: Restructure probe() for multi-PMIC support
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:47:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3a49df1-372c-46c3-869b-205ddfd18cad@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241226215412.395822-8-s-ramamoorthy@ti.com>



On 26/12/2024 23:54, Shree Ramamoorthy wrote:
> The probe() function will now utilize the register_regulators() and
> request_irqs() helper functions defined in the previous patch. Probe() will
> cycle through common (overlapping) regulators and irqs first, and then
> handle device-specific resources identified using the chip_data struct.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c | 66 +++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c
> index 8469ee89802c..b27888fd1fa8 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c
> @@ -413,54 +413,42 @@ static int tps65219_request_irqs(struct tps65219_regulator_irq_type *irq_types,
>  static int tps65219_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct tps65219 *tps = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> -	struct regulator_dev *rdev;
>  	struct regulator_config config = { };
> -	int i;
>  	int error;
> -	int irq;
>  	struct tps65219_regulator_irq_data *irq_data;
> -	struct tps65219_regulator_irq_type *irq_type;
> +	struct chip_data *pmic;

reverse xmas tree.

>  
> -	config.dev = tps->dev;
> -	config.driver_data = tps;
> -	config.regmap = tps->regmap;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(regulators); i++) {
> -		rdev = devm_regulator_register(&pdev->dev, &regulators[i],
> -					       &config);
> -		if (IS_ERR(rdev))
> -			return dev_err_probe(tps->dev, PTR_ERR(rdev),
> -					"Failed to register %s regulator\n",
> -					regulators[i].name);
> -	}
> -
> -	irq_data = devm_kmalloc(tps->dev,
> -				ARRAY_SIZE(tps65219_regulator_irq_types) *
> -				sizeof(struct tps65219_regulator_irq_data),
> -				GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!irq_data)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tps65219_regulator_irq_types); ++i) {
> -		irq_type = &tps65219_regulator_irq_types[i];
> +	enum pmic_id chip = platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
>  
> -		irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, irq_type->irq_name);
> -		if (irq < 0)
> -			return -EINVAL;

need a new line after declarations.

> +	pmic = &chip_info_table[chip];
>  
> -		irq_data[i].dev = tps->dev;
> -		irq_data[i].type = irq_type;
> +	config.dev = tps->dev;
> +	config.driver_data = tps;
> +	config.regmap = tps->regmap;
>  
> -		error = devm_request_threaded_irq(tps->dev, irq, NULL,
> -						  tps65219_regulator_irq_handler,
> -						  IRQF_ONESHOT,
> -						  irq_type->irq_name,
> -						  &irq_data[i]);
> -		if (error) {
> -			dev_err(tps->dev, "failed to request %s IRQ %d: %d\n",
> -				irq_type->irq_name, irq, error);
> +	error = tps65219_register_regulators(pmic->common_rdesc, tps,
> +						&pdev->dev, config, pmic->common_rdesc_size);
> +	if (error)

maybe you could use goto and do any cleanup
and in the end use dev_err_probe().

> +		return error;
> +
> +	error = tps65219_register_regulators(pmic->rdesc, tps, &pdev->dev,
> +						config, pmic->rdesc_size);
> +	if (error)
> +		return error;
> +
> +	irq_data = devm_kmalloc(tps->dev, pmic->common_irq_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	error = tps65219_request_irqs(pmic->common_irq_types, tps, pdev,
> +					irq_data, pmic->common_irq_size);
> +	if (error)
> +		return error;
> +
> +	if (chip == TPS65219) {
> +		irq_data = devm_kmalloc(tps->dev, pmic->dev_irq_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		error = tps65219_request_irqs(pmic->irq_types, tps, pdev,
> +						irq_data, pmic->dev_irq_size);
> +		if (error)
>  			return error;
> -		}
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;

-- 
cheers,
-roger


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-04 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-26 21:54 [PATCH v1 0/7] Add TI TPS65215 PMIC Regulator Support Shree Ramamoorthy
2024-12-26 21:54 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] regulator: dt-bindings: Add TI TPS65215 PMIC bindings Shree Ramamoorthy
2024-12-27 17:45   ` Conor Dooley
2025-01-04 18:28   ` Roger Quadros
2024-12-26 21:54 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] regulator: tps65215: Update platform_device_id table Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-01-01 10:49   ` Christophe JAILLET
2024-12-26 21:54 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] regulator: tps65215: Update function & struct names Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-01-04 18:35   ` Roger Quadros
2024-12-26 21:54 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] regulator: tps65215: Update IRQ structs to include TPS65215 Shree Ramamoorthy
2024-12-26 21:54 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] regulator: tps65215: Add chip_data struct for multi-PMIC support Shree Ramamoorthy
2024-12-26 21:54 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] regulator: tps65215: Define probe() helper functions Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-01-01 11:01   ` Christophe JAILLET
2025-01-02 23:41     ` Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-01-03 13:10       ` Christophe JAILLET
2025-01-04 18:42       ` Roger Quadros
2025-01-04 18:45   ` Roger Quadros
2025-01-06 22:02     ` Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-01-06 22:57       ` Andrew Davis
2025-01-07 21:09         ` Shree Ramamoorthy
2024-12-26 21:54 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] regulator: tps65215: Restructure probe() for multi-PMIC support Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-01-01 11:04   ` Christophe JAILLET
2025-01-02 23:46     ` Shree Ramamoorthy
2025-01-04 18:47   ` Roger Quadros [this message]
2025-01-07 21:12     ` Shree Ramamoorthy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b3a49df1-372c-46c3-869b-205ddfd18cad@kernel.org \
    --to=rogerq@kernel.org \
    --cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
    --cc=andreas@kemnade.info \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jerome.neanne@baylibre.com \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m-leonard@ti.com \
    --cc=praneeth@ti.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=s-ramamoorthy@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).