From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D2AC12002 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 06:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719E160FF1 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 06:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234058AbhGUFnQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 01:43:16 -0400 Received: from so254-9.mailgun.net ([198.61.254.9]:57232 "EHLO so254-9.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233642AbhGUFmm (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 01:42:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1626848599; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: Date: Message-ID: From: References: Cc: To: Subject: Sender; bh=EXl6e0NnYNt6QhqMh3qY0wjuq0W1EMQQYn9QnynAyfE=; b=RJ/oPaQRXI7klJVwuFwvjeemPwUeR8b8Yc684b6ZmMTPcwE6Wej4tB2s8ItcLQTvuZfLWFu5 FMPQ/DcoO1OuAX+78H7rSJu2OQ7AQBwqwiPuuaaqBnC8AzMzfe1JjEjC0mGpvwFus7X1X8Xh p9S7MEB2ZO7SbKZdj425fJ+6M94= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 198.61.254.9 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI1YmJiNiIsICJkZXZpY2V0cmVlQHZnZXIua2VybmVsLm9yZyIsICJiZTllNGEiXQ== Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n04.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 60f7bd4ce31d882d1862dd6e (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 06:23:08 GMT Sender: wcheng=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EF881C43144; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 06:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.110.40.148] (i-global254.qualcomm.com [199.106.103.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: wcheng) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D3EEC433D3; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 06:23:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 2D3EEC433D3 Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=wcheng@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 3/6] usb: dwc3: Resize TX FIFOs to meet EP bursting requirements To: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" Cc: Felipe Balbi , Thinh Nguyen , "agross@kernel.org" , "bjorn.andersson@linaro.org" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "frowand.list@gmail.com" , "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "jackp@codeaurora.org" References: <1625908395-5498-1-git-send-email-wcheng@codeaurora.org> <1625908395-5498-4-git-send-email-wcheng@codeaurora.org> <87czrmzjym.fsf@kernel.org> <877dhtz9de.fsf@kernel.org> <6bc35b95-8386-1a6b-46dd-f33035e6dee5@codeaurora.org> From: Wesley Cheng Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 23:23:03 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 7/20/2021 4:41 AM, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 12:30:07AM -0700, Wesley Cheng wrote: >> >> >> On 7/13/2021 11:40 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Thinh Nguyen writes: >>>>> Thinh Nguyen writes: >>>>>> Wesley Cheng wrote: >>>>>>> Some devices have USB compositions which may require multiple endpoints >>>>>>> that support EP bursting. HW defined TX FIFO sizes may not always be >>>>>>> sufficient for these compositions. By utilizing flexible TX FIFO >>>>>>> allocation, this allows for endpoints to request the required FIFO depth to >>>>>>> achieve higher bandwidth. With some higher bMaxBurst configurations, using >>>>>>> a larger TX FIFO size results in better TX throughput. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> By introducing the check_config() callback, the resizing logic can fetch >>>>>>> the maximum number of endpoints used in the USB composition (can contain >>>>>>> multiple configurations), which helps ensure that the resizing logic can >>>>>>> fulfill the configuration(s), or return an error to the gadget layer >>>>>>> otherwise during bind time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 15 +++ >>>>>>> drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h | 16 ++++ >>>>>>> drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c | 2 + >>>>>>> drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 232 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>> 4 files changed, 265 insertions(+) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c >>>>>>> index ba74ad7..b194aecd 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c >>>>>>> @@ -1267,6 +1267,7 @@ static void dwc3_get_properties(struct dwc3 *dwc) >>>>>>> u8 rx_max_burst_prd; >>>>>>> u8 tx_thr_num_pkt_prd; >>>>>>> u8 tx_max_burst_prd; >>>>>>> + u8 tx_fifo_resize_max_num; >>>>>>> const char *usb_psy_name; >>>>>>> int ret; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> @@ -1282,6 +1283,13 @@ static void dwc3_get_properties(struct dwc3 *dwc) >>>>>>> */ >>>>>>> hird_threshold = 12; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> + /* >>>>>>> + * default to a TXFIFO size large enough to fit 6 max packets. This >>>>>>> + * allows for systems with larger bus latencies to have some headroom >>>>>>> + * for endpoints that have a large bMaxBurst value. >>>>>>> + */ >>>>>>> + tx_fifo_resize_max_num = 6; >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> dwc->maximum_speed = usb_get_maximum_speed(dev); >>>>>>> dwc->max_ssp_rate = usb_get_maximum_ssp_rate(dev); >>>>>>> dwc->dr_mode = usb_get_dr_mode(dev); >>>>>>> @@ -1325,6 +1333,11 @@ static void dwc3_get_properties(struct dwc3 *dwc) >>>>>>> &tx_thr_num_pkt_prd); >>>>>>> device_property_read_u8(dev, "snps,tx-max-burst-prd", >>>>>>> &tx_max_burst_prd); >>>>>>> + dwc->do_fifo_resize = device_property_read_bool(dev, >>>>>>> + "tx-fifo-resize"); >>>>>>> + if (dwc->do_fifo_resize) >>>>>>> + device_property_read_u8(dev, "tx-fifo-max-num", >>>>>>> + &tx_fifo_resize_max_num); >>>>>> >>>>>> Why is this check here? The dwc->tx_fifo_resize_max_num should store >>>>>> whatever property the user sets. Whether the driver wants to use this >>>>> >>>>> Ack! >>>>> >>>>>> property should depend on "dwc->do_fifo_resize". Also why don't we have >>>>>> "snps," prefix to be consistent with the other properties? >>>>> >>>>> Ack! >>>>> >>>>>> Can we enforce to a single property? If the designer wants to enable >>>>>> this feature, he/she can to provide the tx-fifo-max-num. This would >>>>>> simplify the driver a bit. Since this is to optimize for performance, >>>>>> the user should know/want/test the specific value if they want to set >>>>>> for their setup and not hoping that the default setting not break their >>>>>> setup. So we can remove the "do_fifo_resize" property and just check >>>>>> whether tx_fifo_resize_max_num is set. >>>>> >>>>> Ack! >>>>> >>>>> All very valid points :-) >>>>> >> >> Hi Thinh/Felipe, >> >>>> >>>> Looks like this series already landed in Greg's testing branch. Not sure >>>> how we usually handle this to address some of our concerns. Add fix >>>> patches on top of Greg's testing branch? >>> >>> yup, no choice anymore :-( >>> >> >> Let me review your feedback, which had some good points. We can add a >> change addressing everything on top of what is merged on Greg's branch. Hi Greg, > > Any hint as to when these fixups will be sent? > Will get something by mid-week next week. Sorry have been occupied with tasks on my end. Thanks Wesley Cheng -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project