Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: stm32mp1: adapt example for "st,stm32mp1-rcc-secure"

[Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>]

Hi Rob

On 5/10/22 16:57, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:47:05AM +0200, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
>> Hi Rob
>>
>> On 5/9/22 21:16, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Mon, 09 May 2022 15:46:58 +0200, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>>>> For "st,stm32mp1-rcc-secure" schema, clocks and clock-names entries are now
>>>> required properties.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
>>>>
>>>
>>> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
>>> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
>>>
>>> yamllint warnings/errors:
>>>
>>> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
>>> Error: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.example.dts:27.33-34 syntax error
>>> FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree
>>> make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.lib:364: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.example.dtb] Error 1
>>> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>>> make: *** [Makefile:1401: dt_binding_check] Error 2
>>>
>>> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
>>>
>>> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/
>>>
>>> This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
>>> series is generally the most recent rc1.
>>>
>>> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
>>> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
>>> date:
>>>
>>> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
>>>
>>> Please check and re-submit.
>>>
>>
>> I just updated dtschema and yamllint seems to be well installed. I don't see
>> the see above. I wrote this patch on top of my stm32-next tree. Do I have to
>> send it directly to arm-soc in order to be merged on top of my latest
>> pull-request ?
> 
> That appears to be header related AFAICT. Maybe you have header changes
> in your tree. The issue this is fixing is in your tree, so it should be
> applied there.

Ah yes! CK_SCMIxxx have changed in my tree (merged in arm-soc tree) and 
this patch is done on top of this change. So has to be applied in arm-soc.
So I just have to send it directly to Arnd and arm-soc ?

Alex


> 
> Rob