From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Kamal Wadhwa <kamal.wadhwa@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Jishnu Prakash <jishnu.prakash@oss.qualcomm.com>,
David Collins <david.collins@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Pankaj Patil <pankaj.patil@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: spmi: add bindings for glymur-spmi-pmic-arb (arbiter v8)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 02:33:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b79fd81a-e127-4558-8732-3adebb8ab2c6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250924-glymur-spmi-v8-v2-1-202fc7a66a97@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 24/09/2025 01:57, Kamal Wadhwa wrote:
> From: Jishnu Prakash <jishnu.prakash@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
> SPMI PMIC Arbiter version 8 builds upon version 7 with support for
> up to four SPMI buses. To achieve this, the register map was
A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings for". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
See also:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17-rc3/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18
> slightly rearranged. Add a new binding file and compatible string
> for version 8 using the name 'glymur' as the Qualcomm Technologies,
> Inc. Glymur SoC is the first one to use PMIC arbiter version 8. This
> specifies the new register ranges needed only for version 8.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Collins <david.collins@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jishnu Prakash <jishnu.prakash@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Patil <pankaj.patil@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kamal Wadhwa <kamal.wadhwa@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/spmi/qcom,glymur-spmi-pmic-arb.yaml | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 158 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/qcom,glymur-spmi-pmic-arb.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/qcom,glymur-spmi-pmic-arb.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e80997a5fb4bcf59328e49c8b3e68c9511176a8c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/qcom,glymur-spmi-pmic-arb.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/spmi/qcom,glymur-spmi-pmic-arb.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Glymur SPMI Controller (PMIC Arbiter v8)
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
I don't think so, why would Stephen care about Glymur? Did I miss some
job change? And if I did not miss, then when you don't want to maintain
your own stuff, neither we want.
> +
> +description: |
> + The Glymur SPMI PMIC Arbiter implements HW version 8 and it's an SPMI
> + controller with wrapping arbitration logic to allow for multiple on-chip
> + devices to control up to 4 SPMI separate buses.
> +
> + The PMIC Arbiter can also act as an interrupt controller, providing interrupts
> + to slave devices.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - qcom,glymur-spmi-pmic-arb
> +
> + reg:
> + items:
> + - description: core registers
> + - description: tx-channel per virtual slave registers
> + - description: rx-channel (called observer) per virtual slave registers
> + - description: channel to PMIC peripheral mapping registers
> +
> + reg-names:
> + items:
> + - const: core
> + - const: chnls
> + - const: obsrvr
> + - const: chnl_map
> +
> + ranges: true
> +
> + '#address-cells':
> + const: 2
> +
> + '#size-cells':
> + const: 2
> +
> + qcom,ee:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> + minimum: 0
> + maximum: 5
> + description: >
Drop >
> + indicates the active Execution Environment identifier
> +
> + qcom,channel:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> + minimum: 0
> + maximum: 5
> + description: >
Drop >
> + which of the PMIC Arb provided channels to use for accesses
> +
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-10 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-24 16:57 [PATCH v2 0/2] spmi: spmi-pmic-arb: Add support for PMIC arbiter v8 for Glymur Kamal Wadhwa
2025-09-24 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: spmi: add bindings for glymur-spmi-pmic-arb (arbiter v8) Kamal Wadhwa
2025-10-10 0:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2025-10-10 0:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-24 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] spmi: spmi-pmic-arb: add support for PMIC arbiter v8 Kamal Wadhwa
2025-09-25 23:15 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-26 4:48 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b79fd81a-e127-4558-8732-3adebb8ab2c6@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=david.collins@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jishnu.prakash@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=kamal.wadhwa@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pankaj.patil@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).