From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Ujfalusi Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: twl6040: Handle mclk used for HPPLL and optional internal clock source Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 12:23:02 +0300 Message-ID: References: <1462965209-6955-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <20160516150231.GA5527@rob-hp-laptop> <7d5e3117-a014-0107-bf75-775401834e02@ti.com> <20160607091739.GD18047@dell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160607091739.GD18047@dell> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Jones Cc: Rob Herring , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 06/07/16 12:17, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 07 Jun 2016, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >=20 >> Lee, >> >> On 05/16/16 18:02, Rob Herring wrote: >>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:13:29PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >>>> On some boards, like omap5-uevm the MCLK is gated by default and i= n order >>>> to be able to use the High performance modes of twl6040 it need to= be >>>> enabled by SW. >>>> Add support for handling the MCLK source clock via CCF. >>>> At the same time lover the print priority of the notification that= the 32K >>>> clock is not proveded so it is not going to be handled by the driv= er. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi >>>> --- >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/twl6040.txt | 4 +-- >>> >>> Acked-by: Rob Herring >> >> Can you take a look at this patch if it is OK to pick? >=20 > Yes, when I get around to it. >=20 > I currently have 75 patch review to conduct in my inbox. Some of the= m > are quite large and complex. They will be seen to in the order they > were sent, and you just bumped this patch to "sent today". ;) I'm sorry for this. I did not intended to interfere with your workflow.= I will be more patient next time, it is hard to know if I should bump the thre= ad or resend or wait. Sorry again, P=C3=A9ter