From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-p-103.mailbox.org (mout-p-103.mailbox.org [80.241.56.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7666A239E88 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2025 02:05:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.161 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762221902; cv=none; b=TZGcYGTDMVkl0N6epemTQ6R5P0DVQCcDXYetB+EfuqPttcEtMcMO3/9WIiTR6IidfODxzfBQhAI1beeWL12/lfLk6Yy393abLZ/2kzB8Ce0it8iOFvV3GvXgxw+itMyJ4Yv+hDiRNjLoV1K0mozSpqVweZb6M6u7UbwNqxqInjU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762221902; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VQ6ZbWc/+0kA0XArRYwHD1GETvoyhwhdHwWcUTKzdBc=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=XjgRYlK5J4s7YblYfoAZ7R6OjMAugd1VDRUnPYOOx+H8EnSsudNSQWjYZswfq5aohNS49Ia+9UXQkMusZmasyyAaAVUlTIfbt0zd9SfBAo5RbU3vbePzZ3IEUQhTu96ANdT2RxqsjEMOc8KfEBJo9lJha+x0FXphIerpJpJ2DXM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b=RtgfVc6B; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.161 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b="RtgfVc6B" Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [10.196.197.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-103.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4d0sGd5r2Xz9th6; Tue, 4 Nov 2025 03:04:57 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1762221897; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Q0yWbu7y1QVa2c8kKeP3bloSf5n0MlRqUOGmDNRFYWs=; b=RtgfVc6BU5L52qXx6mbD7p7VtqF4yj+yLn55bS3cm5xcC4cm9RS19rhx7NeFUYWAsg8KpG E8A+X2LgR4HdJRRXGiyl6zt3aCz38ZsfLE+ssHatAOXcdM7+29FsSUW0WZm/yzWChe+XDi CRF1VpVsx8xqcG7FVeD38C3U9unZ3XbB4ys7Df1kL2e8DEj/nEN2BW+10XY0v4sCkzO+sH gYbSDjqwNPHG0/Xx43THSDWf0dE0uXHBdTBAdxr1q40ImSVqONPKXIiYQ8IjrDq0qdSjnV 7CY3eG+avTc+gbbY66ug9hli5gN7Ix4L/Ig5Pc18wCXOfMyYpptResjQWu9RzA== Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 00:47:58 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: dts: imx95: Describe Mali G310 GPU To: Rain Yang Cc: shawnguo2@yeah.net, airlied@gmail.com, boris.brezillon@collabora.com, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, festevam@gmail.com, imx@lists.linux.dev, kernel@pengutronix.de, krzk+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, liviu.dudau@arm.com, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, robh@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, shawnguo@kernel.org, simona@ffwll.ch, sre@kernel.org, steven.price@arm.com, tzimmermann@suse.de, xianzhong.li@nxp.com References: <20250925203938.169880-1-marek.vasut@mailbox.org> <20250925203938.169880-2-marek.vasut@mailbox.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Marek Vasut In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MBO-RS-META: azhnsga89ktmxpihnm4emkymm3cay3uo X-MBO-RS-ID: ab159e2ebd1e51d8cf5 On 11/3/25 8:46 AM, Rain Yang wrote: Hello Rain, > thanks for your patch to make i.MX95 GPU upstreamed. > Maybe I didn't express it clearly in the previous e-mails. > the always-on GPUAPB clock must be removed, otherwise, it will result in redundant and unnecessary > function call to M33. DT should describe the hardware fully, that means DT should also describe the clock. Why should this clock description be removed from DT ? The SCMI clock call over SMT transport is cheap. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut