From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A73C7EE2F for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2023 15:33:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241579AbjFIPdK (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2023 11:33:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33014 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241602AbjFIPdI (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2023 11:33:08 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x636.google.com (mail-ej1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::636]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8B0630FD for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2023 08:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x636.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-970028cfb6cso342764066b.1 for ; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 08:33:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1686324784; x=1688916784; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ur31KDmwW2Vamx0iLWm8eg6eZn3xEBjuZ8itz/0+GJ8=; b=mdsstRzL1QzvciUaKcbVLGU5Xu4erVa66pzYFwSDmbTqK10o6fleyMabNyzGT2Vylr zsKdcQQcxcccKeNdC7iRPc7v9j5B0cpKHto6OR1Zhl6ijtRroUJCbvb44JOBxPvOI0bc C93vTwtSB1Sjlgh/zaI+HPLS2r+eqJLRT4PG2CmH40Zck2w3jxN9gANBo4S0nkD6NRy/ ACXeLJR0qtn5HU2RdtFkK/L+AFCqwZB2hpRFz7Nr5PVGjyyeIZ7c15hlBVuuyz1L68bf FdCP86LpyK2HBGj0rP9yli/1eRC8ioYTEGOOob6vWkvYMiAIAqG586uZ2t4mIAUGkJxx AKGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686324784; x=1688916784; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ur31KDmwW2Vamx0iLWm8eg6eZn3xEBjuZ8itz/0+GJ8=; b=io5jjYBAF8t5PsAwVxYTNmgczc+46YklyI7yPzNeAtBzA62xqnIPs/C5QN28fiAIZp YmVvFA24X9eP/pt/RpuBraK5oOun+l+yQwRLorMsGw4qaIZqxNLeflobvKecKrmuek0G JzGNqkiahWeNexQjh6VQKUTHVjocHRzKLR82p7enwAzmTxz/IyuQAYk/kw83ANhGS0Mn /lkQFJAqiGzfMGd1p0v3br8fnTiG3cQMNHD82u5wxdTFBlU9s+sHUV7BjyGzJalfB3OK aZiPgmhOlGi3aylpnE2J106xFevltI2+aKzXmF/Vbqx9s3UCVmyl2MNWOMRUuoC/E2Cr ts4A== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxoeoZvFNPd1nu2/QFWeE6LRwzlHh7qlKBzaOt3ufi0AC4fyGPP ngpQYzBUeRtOsuzl40gtvN3eNw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6y/JtCqm1Lj+q+Mwlen94gR/wsS1Sunol9iGCi91EQ5CdAJ2o7vqnELK3VT2rNmemmAe/ldw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:dc8e:b0:968:4ce9:677a with SMTP id cs14-20020a170906dc8e00b009684ce9677amr2279333ejc.38.1686324784301; Fri, 09 Jun 2023 08:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.20] ([178.197.219.26]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e25-20020a170906081900b0094ee3e4c934sm1400632ejd.221.2023.06.09.08.33.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Jun 2023 08:33:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 17:33:01 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings:iio:adc: add max14001 Content-Language: en-US To: Kim Seer Paller Cc: jic23@kernel.org, lars@metafoo.de, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org References: <20230608175517.40217-1-kimseer.paller@analog.com> <20230608175517.40217-2-kimseer.paller@analog.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <20230608175517.40217-2-kimseer.paller@analog.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 08/06/2023 19:55, Kim Seer Paller wrote: > The MAX14001 is configurable, isolated 10-bit ADCs for multi-range > binary inputs. Subject: still missing spaces, no improvements. This is a friendly reminder during the review process. It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them. Thank you. With subject fixed: Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski --- This is an automated instruction, just in case, because many review tags are being ignored. If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540 Best regards, Krzysztof