Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] clk: meson: axg: move reset controller's code to separate module

[Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>]

On Di, 2024-04-09 at 19:27 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Conor Dooley (2024-04-09 05:05:37)
> > On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 06:05:51PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > 
> > > > > Seconded, the clk-mpfs/reset-mpfs and clk-starfive-jh7110-sys/reset-
> > > > > starfive-jh7110 drivers are examples of this.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > The auxiliary device creation function can also be in the
> > > > > > drivers/reset/ directory so that the clk driver calls some function
> > > > > > to create and register the device.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'm undecided about this, do you think mpfs_reset_controller_register()
> > > > > and jh7110_reset_controller_register() should rather live with the
> > > > > reset aux drivers in drivers/reset/ ?
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, and also mpfs_reset_read() and friends. We should pass the base
> > > > iomem pointer and parent device to mpfs_reset_adev_alloc() instead and
> > > > then move all that code into drivers/reset with some header file
> > > > exported function to call. That way the clk driver hands over the data
> > > > without having to implement half the implementation.
> > > 
> > > I'll todo list that :)
> > 
> > Something like the below?
> > 
> > -- >8 --
> > From a12f281d2cb869bcd9a6ffc45d0c6a0d3aa2e9e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> > Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 11:54:34 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] clock, reset: microchip: move all mpfs reset code to the
> >  reset subsystem
> > 
> > <insert something here>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> 
> Looks pretty good.

Yes, that does look convincing.

regards
Philipp