From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CFF2C6FA83 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 08:11:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229547AbiIJIK7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Sep 2022 04:10:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60078 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229517AbiIJIK6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Sep 2022 04:10:58 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A50E482F81 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 01:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id a14so2527821ljj.8 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 01:10:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=txFmNqivSGonl1t91BWxPpRyV6wFFoxPfmlb622zlU4=; b=A5TM8+1WniIN3PtwC3BZhC1jY1dASPxIPewi0arGlquPn/062oVa4wvFnMaDdQ66xH lLilxwCx+Oczx5jWgRyQAg2ip6OazqkWh4V1XGR+5gIyckfUpA9X8SqJjFyZ9pnRxktj 2+zY2Wbhp317Cx2fosdt/tCEvQLJwCf3HpMROaX2tqvwQuaQZnNiWg3z/MJEsvvxSkeE DvFlwqgD3HwX/BAKIc4wnOuWTCDa/EAWxAAGuwbzVd41uc7TfsfZhmE6x6K+Fxk299rC NcqRotinLeaE2WIaVpi4zQ1ropa7GfNiFpkLdd1oK6uzUNnuzaig1dB0hts3oEkvc+Pf LL6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=txFmNqivSGonl1t91BWxPpRyV6wFFoxPfmlb622zlU4=; b=vXRqdAWcB5mtMKd2eAPe9ZPSeKeTEM8otOFcT0aWBRHMZA+5rOK8JTUn+/2cDDIe28 2eKGnFRZlAi3xYLUYFTnjyrFQZYV6N0qrTeaVx5CQThCLV4IKAWuVod814RE7XWWK86X XwXiy8AJcS4S3mYJBadKnF9S2eOemdJkzcEIDPDxEMd1DtoS21y3F1k6n/zAQ2cL9l15 WL7FdhwsMNWISWNrzjJrH0z6asowQLlH4Edwc9wUFF/KKo7I+6w0C1FrKCB1h9DONPal kY3rKqVdzZeWhRgSsBRxv/bzeKFM66r3PbYMs7NTRzyMU27ajIEE4LmUaVORknVVusQy axMw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0r8dA5diC9Kadwb6G2UgSLytQy8GNGQm3c/uNSlvW3Pd661UDj KnOkSayVrvnBXrIEBK9OWsGwAw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7789VL7NQdhtwL2QwBsV2k2YfdkUDrGL8k0PU+vC77/8Ct9Y0/++AmZJIlkccmwRb2Sq7irw== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8541:0:b0:261:b44b:1a8b with SMTP id u1-20020a2e8541000000b00261b44b1a8bmr5409456ljj.46.1662797454999; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 01:10:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.21] (78-11-189-27.static.ip.netia.com.pl. [78.11.189.27]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s16-20020a05651c201000b00267232d0652sm259553ljo.46.2022.09.10.01.10.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 10 Sep 2022 01:10:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2022 10:10:53 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/4] dt-bindings: hwmon: Add bindings for max31760 Content-Language: en-US To: "Tilki, Ibrahim" , Rob Herring Cc: "jdelvare@suse.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org" , "linux@roeck-us.net" , "linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" References: <20220909133718.388213-1-Ibrahim.Tilki@analog.com> <20220909133718.388213-4-Ibrahim.Tilki@analog.com> <1662740789.477872.1507147.nullmailer@robh.at.kernel.org> <20220909164710.GA1537271-robh@kernel.org> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 09/09/2022 19:48, Tilki, Ibrahim wrote: ded form is: >> >> reg: >> items: >> - items: >> - minimum: 0x50 >> maximum: 0x57 >> > > Actually it passes the check when I remove maxItems property: > > reg: > description: I2C address of slave device. > items: > minimum: 0x50 > maximum: 0x57 > > I cannot find a way to specify both maxItems and min-max limits. > Which one should I drop? Line below is from the output of dt_bindigs_check: > > hint: "maxItems" is not needed with an "items" list Use Rob's first syntax: reg: minimum: 0x50 maximum: 0x57 (this will expect only one item) Best regards, Krzysztof