From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85AF4209678; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 15:18:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738595903; cv=none; b=SEYS+yxGqJARw6MLWL/eGRJKBPcfHoh+PeJXgdloN2VNTWGeoOjfkhCWG4AUEbClFpY9e/V/WtzpI/KE1COgHg/a64J9ZX0556yBq4HRMYGBIMI+WRW+gqifLo2LIXkqspVlU8jzW5jYp4jNf1+F0bmgPvGONGSrXuTtofssW3c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738595903; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FXUWYE8g8BYPC2v17zxasOkU9NpiTsWavbxDyJuAJcc=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=RH/aYQE3WXjzFPhcBGOWpTma5dvBxSxQ4zEdXlRIpIr778MtXEaB5d+chehblWkfRwhqg2/72djCGnZ81Z2QLKozsoMLCisO/+4h4EYQIVtE9JfeoqvKKLOnn3IdEw+yS5ikH55989w5+c/N9TiaiQMtpl9gYhRhNzHRdOSpBxQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=Nlc1VyEi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="Nlc1VyEi" Received: from pps.filterd (m0360072.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 5137X6YA014781; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 15:17:41 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=VQ4RqG 5wX63XHkwCiEdYMzRbUoNudhkrKOhuQwdpm0I=; b=Nlc1VyEiuQjiYLbh9pocM7 CLzpw0KGTWnPjmqHhoJdctttDND+tQK9HnMGI7+5OzI4UOPiC2g1jfxT+E/4BtIV sRXuqVCYEY+QMYpq+kzCJlXYPJJKcC/jr+wBiAnRpFY1GMFrD3kBYJg2cRwGp8VN 3vDv5GV8RucvxRppCS/1GVFpv1u6Bscij0K+xur3Wb5seNOMbt1BYWKIU0Ts97yT yV9Ttyl3qwNR7zYjITItgwJC86BAgbspV7aWTEhxK+vwY8P2JFALSNld4SwgDHCL AU/IXMdkZIM/eZ4ifT84xINshzb+HcutkwCXvamEvqn+VMPoIEEZ7wRGln1XR9ow == Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 44jsgnj3w7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 03 Feb 2025 15:17:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0360072.ppops.net (m0360072.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.0.8/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 513FGR11024317; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 15:17:40 GMT Received: from ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5b.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.91]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 44jsgnj3w4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 03 Feb 2025 15:17:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 513C7pcF024493; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 15:17:39 GMT Received: from smtprelay02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com ([172.16.1.4]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 44hxxmxxnf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 03 Feb 2025 15:17:39 +0000 Received: from smtpav01.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav01.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [10.39.53.228]) by smtprelay02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 513FHcae18088686 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 3 Feb 2025 15:17:38 GMT Received: from smtpav01.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3EC58059; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 15:17:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav01.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301B95804B; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 15:17:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.24.12.86] (unknown [9.24.12.86]) by smtpav01.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 15:17:37 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 09:17:36 -0600 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] bindings: ipmi: Add binding for IPMB device intf To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , brgl@bgdev.pl, linus.walleij@linaro.org, minyard@acm.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, joel@jms.id.au, andrew@codeconstruct.com.au, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, eajames@linux.ibm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20250203144422.269948-1-ninad@linux.ibm.com> <20250203144422.269948-2-ninad@linux.ibm.com> <6def1c5d-d1a0-4a6f-9db2-453692d5423d@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Ninad Palsule In-Reply-To: <6def1c5d-d1a0-4a6f-9db2-453692d5423d@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: bmeP0_XdLDJr4zTpejIH4blsVibc7Jc7 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: LEkVc5s_HyeQNjFOjksxZRwmsKHp-Du9 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1057,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.68.34 definitions=2025-02-03_06,2025-01-31_02,2024-11-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=994 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2501170000 definitions=main-2502030110 Hi Krzysztof, Thanks for the review. >> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) >> Signed-off-by: Ninad Palsule > You still need to fix the subject. Why patch #1 has bindings but patch > #2 dt-bindings? Why can't this be consistent? What is preferred now a days? bindings or dt-bindings? -- Thanks & Regards, Ninad