From: Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>
To: "Bryan O'Donoghue" <bod.linux@nxsw.ie>,
jerome.debretagne@gmail.com,
"Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@kernel.org>,
"Konrad Dybcio" <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"Lorenzo Bianconi" <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
"Maximilian Luz" <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Jeff Johnson" <jjohnson@kernel.org>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, ath12k@lists.infradead.org,
Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Dale Whinham <daleyo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] dt-bindings: wireless: ieee80211: Add disable-rfkill property
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 11:23:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c29de60c-c7c6-45d7-8d90-616df23df01c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e0e9e690-c56e-4b56-90f9-2af46a7feaf3@nxsw.ie>
+Cc Mani
Hi,
On 20-Dec-25 07:04, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 20/12/2025 00:21, Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
>>
>> For some devices, Wi-Fi is entirely hard blocked by default making
>> the Wi-Fi radio unusable, except if rfkill is disabled as expected
>> on those models.
>>
>> Commit c6a7c0b09d5f ("wifi: ath12k: Add Support for enabling or
>> disabling specific features based on ACPI bitflag") added a way to
>> support features set via ACPI, including the DISABLE_RFKILL bit.
>>
>> Add a disable-rfkill property to expose the DISABLE_RFKILL bit
>> equivalent for devices described by a Devicetree instead of ACPI.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.yaml | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.yaml
>> index d89f7a3f88a71d45d6f4ab2ae909eae09cbcaf9a..c10a4675640be947cd0b5eaec2c7ff367fd93945 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ieee80211.yaml
>> @@ -29,6 +29,12 @@ properties:
>> different 5 GHz subbands. Using them incorrectly could not work or
>> decrease performance noticeably
>>
>> + disable-rfkill:
>> + type: boolean
>> + description:
>> + Disable rfkill for some devices on which Wi-Fi would be entirely hard
>> + blocked by default otherwise
>> +
>> additionalProperties: true
>>
>> examples:
>>
>> --
>> 2.47.3
>>
>>
>>
>
> Is this really a hardware description though ?
I would say yes it is. The wifi chip has an rfkill input pin and
things will be broken when that pin is hardwired to a fixed value
rather then being actually connected to a GPIO from say
the embedded controller.
So I think that we would need here is not a disable-rfkill property
but some way to indicate in the DT-node that the rfkill input pin
is not connected and thus should be ignored.
This (the rfkill input pin being not-connected) IMHO very much
is hw-description.
Also see the
"[PATCH 0/9] Add support for handling PCIe M.2 Key E connectors in devicetree"
series and then specifically:
https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20251112-pci-m2-e-v1-7-97413d6bf824@oss.qualcomm.com/
Which adds:
+ w_disable1-gpios:
+ description: GPIO controlled connection to W_DISABLE1# signal. This signal
+ is used by the system to disable WiFi radio in the M.2 card. Refer, PCI
+ Express M.2 Specification r4.0, sec 3.1.12.3 for more details.
+ maxItems: 1
What if there is no such GPIO, because the W_DISABLE1# signal is hardwired
in a specific implementation of the M.2 slot ?
In that case we will also need some way to propagate that info to the wifi
driver, having some sort of generic devicetree property for wifi-cards
which can be injected as a software-node property in the PCI-device being
instantiated for the WIFI card to let the driver no not to honor to
W_DISABLE1# signal will be useful here too and this is as hardware-description
as hardware-description can get.
So how about: "w_disable1-not-connected" + "w_disable2-not-connected" boolean
properties in a generic WIFI devicetree binding and also use that here?
> I think this logic belongs in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/ triggering on a compat string.
See above, I do not believe that abusing compat-strings for this is the way
to go.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-22 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-20 0:21 [PATCH v5 0/7] Microsoft Surface Pro 11 support Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay
2025-12-20 0:21 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document Microsoft Surface Pro 11 Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay
2025-12-20 9:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-12-20 0:21 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] dt-bindings: wireless: ieee80211: Add disable-rfkill property Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay
2025-12-20 6:04 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-12-20 9:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-12-20 14:02 ` Jérôme de Bretagne
2025-12-20 16:05 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-12-22 10:06 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-12-22 10:23 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2025-12-22 11:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-12-22 11:45 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-12-22 12:41 ` Hans de Goede
2025-12-22 13:41 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-12-22 14:22 ` Hans de Goede
2025-12-23 6:31 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-12-23 9:23 ` Jérôme de Bretagne
2025-12-20 0:22 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] dt-bindings: wireless: ath12k: Allow " Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay
2025-12-20 0:22 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] firmware: qcom: scm: allow QSEECOM on Surface Pro 11 Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay
2025-12-20 0:22 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] platform/surface: aggregator_registry: Add Surface Pro 11 (QCOM) Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay
2025-12-20 0:22 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for Surface Pro 11 Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay
2025-12-20 0:22 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] wifi: ath12k: Add support for disabling rfkill via devicetree Jérôme de Bretagne via B4 Relay
2025-12-20 6:07 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c29de60c-c7c6-45d7-8d90-616df23df01c@kernel.org \
--to=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=ath12k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=bod.linux@nxsw.ie \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=daleyo@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=jerome.debretagne@gmail.com \
--cc=jjohnson@kernel.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=luzmaximilian@gmail.com \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox