From: rajpat@codeaurora.org
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
swboyd@chromium.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
rnayak@codeaurora.org, saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org,
msavaliy@qti.qualcomm.com, skakit@codeaurora.org,
dianders@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Add QUPv3 wrapper_0 nodes
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 12:36:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c34a664d9f88d29013ed31e398729640@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YSfwxuX22Ix4fqX2@google.com>
On 2021-08-27 01:21, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 06:37:02PM +0530, rajpat@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> On 2021-08-12 19:44, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 01:11:14PM +0530, Rajesh Patil wrote:
>> > > From: Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@codeaurora.org>
>> > >
>> > > Add QUPv3 wrapper_0 DT nodes for SC7280 SoC.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@codeaurora.org>
>> > > Signed-off-by: Rajesh Patil <rajpat@codeaurora.org>
>> > > ---
>> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 720
>> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > > 1 file changed, 720 insertions(+)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> > > index f8dd5ff..e461395 100644
>> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> > >
>> > > ...
>> > >
>> > > + spi0: spi@980000 {
>> > > + compatible = "qcom,geni-spi";
>> > > + reg = <0 0x00980000 0 0x4000>;
>> > > + clock-names = "se";
>> > > + clocks = <&gcc GCC_QUPV3_WRAP0_S0_CLK>;
>> > > + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> > > + pinctrl-0 = <&qup_spi0_data_clk>, <&qup_spi0_cs>,
>> > > <&qup_spi0_cs_gpio>;
>> >
>> > What is the story behind 'qup_spiN_cs' and 'qup_spiN_cs_gpio'? Both
>> > configure
>> > the CS pin with a different function:
>> >
>>
>> As per discussion here [1], we have split like this.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1393353/#1591826
>
> IIUC that's only about having separate configs for each pin, instead of
> groups like 'qup-spi0-default'. What you are doing above with
> 'qup_spi0_cs'
> and 'qup_spi0_cs_gpio' is to configure the same pin (GPIO 3) both as
> SPI
> chip select and as GPIO. Which one is it?
>
> I imagine we want to have both pinctrl definitions to allow a board to
> configure the pin either as SPI CS or GPIO. However it should be only
> one
> of the two at a time, and the SoC .dtsi should provide a reasonable
> default, which probably is SPI CS.
>
I agree. Will remove it in next version.
> Maybe I'm missing something, if so please provide details on why it is
> necessary to have this config.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-01 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-12 7:41 [PATCH V5 0/7] Add QSPI and QUPv3 DT nodes for SC7280 SoC Rajesh Patil
2021-08-12 7:41 ` [PATCH V5 1/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Add QSPI node Rajesh Patil
2021-08-12 13:09 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-08-26 12:59 ` rajpat
2021-09-03 15:46 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-08-12 7:41 ` [PATCH V5 2/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Configure SPI-NOR FLASH for sc7280-idp Rajesh Patil
2021-08-12 13:15 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-08-23 11:44 ` rajpat
2021-08-12 7:41 ` [PATCH V5 3/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Add QUPv3 wrapper_0 nodes Rajesh Patil
2021-08-12 14:14 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-08-12 16:22 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-08-26 13:07 ` rajpat
2021-08-26 19:51 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-09-01 7:06 ` rajpat [this message]
2021-08-19 0:04 ` Doug Anderson
2021-08-26 12:53 ` rajpat
2021-08-12 7:41 ` [PATCH V5 4/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Update QUPv3 UART5 DT node Rajesh Patil
2021-08-12 15:46 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-08-12 7:41 ` [PATCH V5 5/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Configure debug uart for sc7280-idp Rajesh Patil
2021-08-12 16:05 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-08-26 13:07 ` rajpat
2021-08-12 7:41 ` [PATCH V5 6/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Configure uart7 to support bluetooth on sc7280-idp Rajesh Patil
2021-08-12 19:22 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-08-12 7:41 ` [PATCH V5 7/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Add QUPv3 wrapper_1 nodes Rajesh Patil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c34a664d9f88d29013ed31e398729640@codeaurora.org \
--to=rajpat@codeaurora.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=msavaliy@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=skakit@codeaurora.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).