Re: [PATCH 2/2] irqchip: irq-qcom-mpm: Support passing a slice of SRAM as reg space

[Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>]

On 29.03.2023 05:49, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 12:02:53PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> The MPM hardware is accessible to us from the ARM CPUs through a shared
>> memory region (RPM MSG RAM) that's also concurrently accessed by other
>> kinds of cores on the system (like modem, ADSP etc.). Modeling this
>> relation in a (somewhat) sane manner in the device tree basically
>> requires us to either present the MPM as a child of said memory region
>> (which makes little sense, as a mapped memory carveout is not a bus),
>> define nodes which bleed their register spaces into one another, or
>> passing their slice of the MSG RAM through some kind of a property.
>>
>> Go with the third option and add a way to map a region passed through
>> the "qcom,rpm-msg-ram" property as our register space.
>>
>> The current way of using 'reg' is preserved for ABI reasons.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-qcom-mpm.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-qcom-mpm.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-qcom-mpm.c
>> index d30614661eea..6fe59f4deef4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-qcom-mpm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-qcom-mpm.c
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
>>  #include <linux/module.h>
>>  #include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
>>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>  #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
>> @@ -322,8 +323,10 @@ static int qcom_mpm_init(struct device_node *np, struct device_node *parent)
>>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>  	struct irq_domain *parent_domain;
>>  	struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
>> +	struct device_node *msgram_np;
>>  	struct qcom_mpm_priv *priv;
>>  	unsigned int pin_cnt;
>> +	struct resource res;
>>  	int i, irq;
>>  	int ret;
>>  
>> @@ -374,9 +377,21 @@ static int qcom_mpm_init(struct device_node *np, struct device_node *parent)
>>  
>>  	raw_spin_lock_init(&priv->lock);
>>  
>> -	priv->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
>> -	if (IS_ERR(priv->base))
>> -		return PTR_ERR(priv->base);
>> +	/* If we have a handle to an RPM message ram partition, use it. */
>> +	msgram_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "qcom,rpm-msg-ram", 0);
>> +	if (msgram_np) {
>> +		ret = of_address_to_resource(msgram_np, 0, &res);
>> +		/* Don't use devm_ioremap_resource, as we're accessing a shared region. */
>> +		priv->base = ioremap(res.start, resource_size(&res));
> 
> Are you suggesting that other cores/drivers will also need to access
> the mpm slice below?
> 
> 	apss_mpm: sram@1b8 {
> 		reg = <0x1b8 0x48>;
> 	};
Yes, the RPM M3 core. Other slices may be accessed
by any core at any time.

Konrad
> 
> Shawn
> 
>> +		of_node_put(msgram_np);
>> +		if (IS_ERR(priv->base))
>> +			return PTR_ERR(priv->base);
>> +	} else {
>> +		/* Otherwise, fall back to simple MMIO. */
>> +		priv->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
>> +		if (IS_ERR(priv->base))
>> +			return PTR_ERR(priv->base);
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	for (i = 0; i < priv->reg_stride; i++) {
>>  		qcom_mpm_write(priv, MPM_REG_ENABLE, i, 0);
>> @@ -387,8 +402,10 @@ static int qcom_mpm_init(struct device_node *np, struct device_node *parent)
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> -	if (irq < 0)
>> -		return irq;
>> +	if (irq < 0) {
>> +		ret = irq;
>> +		goto unmap_base;
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	genpd = &priv->genpd;
>>  	genpd->flags = GENPD_FLAG_IRQ_SAFE;
>> @@ -451,6 +468,9 @@ static int qcom_mpm_init(struct device_node *np, struct device_node *parent)
>>  	mbox_free_channel(priv->mbox_chan);
>>  remove_genpd:
>>  	pm_genpd_remove(genpd);
>> +unmap_base:
>> +	if (res.start)
>> +		iounmap(priv->base);
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>>
>> -- 
>> 2.40.0
>>