From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] spi multi chipselect support
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:19:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c497b0e2-c663-fa29-dabc-6dd5ca26e0a4@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180718163530.zsa5md3huz3dnotb@earth.universe>
On 07/18/2018 06:35 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Some SPI slave devices have more than one chip select [0]. Rob suggested
> to use the following DT notation for this [1]:
>
> spi-controller {
> slave@0 {
> reg = <0>, <1>;
> };
> };
>
> I think this makes sense from a DT point of view, but this needs
> quite some changes in the SPI core. I tried to find out, how to
> implement the suggestion in the last few days and I see two
> possibilities:
>
> 1. Register two SPI Linux devices from one DT node. This needs the
> fewest changes in SPI core. But we loose the one-to-one mapping
> of DT nodes to devices. I have a feeling, that this will backfire.
>
> 2. Add support for multiple chip-select to spi_device and modify
> the transfer functions to make use of this. Unfortunately this
> would require changing all spi controller as far as I can see?
>
Hi,
I believe that has been discussed before recently, but I can't find it in
the archives.
My preferred solution would to have something like
i2c_new_secondary_device(), but for SPI. This way the driver that binds to
the compatible string can allocate devices for additional chip selects as
necessary. Also make use of the reg-names property the same way as in I2C.
The only catch here is that locking in the SPI core needs to be re-worked,
since you can't allocate SPI devices from within another SPI device's probe
function. Something like
https://github.com/analogdevicesinc/linux/commit/b5cc8460b959e530413ffbf9b93d8012c80d05df
- Lars
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-18 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-18 16:35 [DISCUSSION] spi multi chipselect support Sebastian Reichel
2018-07-18 17:19 ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
2018-07-19 13:25 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c497b0e2-c663-fa29-dabc-6dd5ca26e0a4@metafoo.de \
--to=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).