devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hal Feng <hal.feng@starfivetech.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@sifive.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] riscv: dts: starfive: Add initial StarFive JH7110 device tree
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 15:21:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c507e0b2-5ca3-cffe-55d2-873ed8c24e3d@starfivetech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y6zHy9oL4xzl+6Rd@spud>

On Wed, 28 Dec 2022 22:48:43 +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 09:12:46AM +0800, Hal Feng wrote:
>> From: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>
>> 
>> Add initial device tree for the JH7110 RISC-V SoC by StarFive
>> Technology Ltd.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>
>> Co-developed-by: Jianlong Huang <jianlong.huang@starfivetech.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jianlong Huang <jianlong.huang@starfivetech.com>
>> Co-developed-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@starfivetech.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@starfivetech.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi | 411 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 411 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..64d260ea1f29
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
>> @@ -0,0 +1,411 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR MIT
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2022 StarFive Technology Co., Ltd.
>> + * Copyright (C) 2022 Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>
>> + */
>> +
>> +/dts-v1/;
>> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/starfive,jh7110-crg.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/reset/starfive,jh7110-crg.h>
>> +
>> +/ {
>> +	compatible = "starfive,jh7110";
>> +	#address-cells = <2>;
>> +	#size-cells = <2>;
>> +
>> +	cpus {
>> +		#address-cells = <1>;
>> +		#size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> +		S76_0: cpu@0 {
>> +			compatible = "sifive,u74-mc", "riscv";
> 
> The label here says S76 but the compatible says u74-mc.

U74-MC has 5 cores including 1 * S7 core and 4 * U74 cores.

> Which is correct? Your docs say S7 and S76, so I would imagine that it
> is actually an S76?

I found SiFive website [1] call it S76, but call it S7 in other places.
So I misunderstood this. Considering the ISA difference you described
as below, I think it's proper to change the label to "S7_0".

[1] https://www.sifive.com/cores/essential

> 
>> +			reg = <0>;
>> +			d-cache-block-size = <64>;
>> +			d-cache-sets = <64>;
>> +			d-cache-size = <8192>;
>> +			d-tlb-sets = <1>;
>> +			d-tlb-size = <40>;
>> +			device_type = "cpu";
>> +			i-cache-block-size = <64>;
>> +			i-cache-sets = <64>;
>> +			i-cache-size = <16384>;
>> +			i-tlb-sets = <1>;
>> +			i-tlb-size = <40>;
>> +			mmu-type = "riscv,sv39";
>> +			next-level-cache = <&ccache>;
>> +			riscv,isa = "rv64imac";
> 
> While I was poking around trying to see if there was some logic behind
> that compatible, I noticed that SiFive's docs for the S76 say it is
> RV64GBC *but* the docs for the u74-mc say "4xRV64GBC and 1xRV64IMAC".
> I assume that rv64imac is the correct one here?

Yes, "RV64IMAC" is correct. The monitor core in U74-MC is a
S7-series core, not S76.

> 
>> +			tlb-split;
>> +			status = "disabled";
>> +
>> +			cpu0_intc: interrupt-controller {
>> +				compatible = "riscv,cpu-intc";
>> +				interrupt-controller;
>> +				#interrupt-cells = <1>;
>> +			};
>> +		};
>> +
>> +		U74_1: cpu@1 {
>> +			compatible = "sifive,u74-mc", "riscv";
>> +			reg = <1>;
>> +			d-cache-block-size = <64>;
>> +			d-cache-sets = <64>;
>> +			d-cache-size = <32768>;
>> +			d-tlb-sets = <1>;
>> +			d-tlb-size = <40>;
>> +			device_type = "cpu";
>> +			i-cache-block-size = <64>;
>> +			i-cache-sets = <64>;
>> +			i-cache-size = <32768>;
>> +			i-tlb-sets = <1>;
>> +			i-tlb-size = <40>;
>> +			mmu-type = "riscv,sv39";
>> +			next-level-cache = <&ccache>;
>> +			riscv,isa = "rv64imafdc";
> 
> That also begs the question:
> Do your u74s support RV64GBC, as the (current) SiFive documentation
> suggests?

Actually, U74 doesn't support the full B extension, and the SiFive doc [1]
describes the ISA of U74 is "RV64GC_Zba_Zbb_Sscofpmf" which "G" includes
"IMAFD". "_Zba_Zbb_Sscofpmf" is not shown in other device trees such as
jh7100.dtsi and fu740-c000.dtsi, so I didn't show them here.

[1] https://sifive.cdn.prismic.io/sifive/2dd11994-693c-4360-8aea-5453d8642c42_u74mc_core_complex_manual_21G3.pdf

Best regards,
Hal

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-01  7:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-20  1:12 [PATCH v3 0/7] Basic device tree support for StarFive JH7110 RISC-V SoC Hal Feng
2022-12-20  1:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] dt-bindings: riscv: Add StarFive JH7110 SoC and VisionFive 2 board Hal Feng
2022-12-20 10:05   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-12-23  2:05     ` Hal Feng
2022-12-20 20:58   ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-23  2:15     ` Hal Feng
2022-12-20  1:12 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] dt-bindings: timer: Add StarFive JH7110 clint Hal Feng
2022-12-20  1:12 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add StarFive JH7110 plic Hal Feng
2022-12-20  1:12 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] dt-bindings: sifive,ccache0: Support StarFive JH7110 SoC Hal Feng
2022-12-20 20:21   ` Rob Herring
2022-12-20  1:12 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] soc: sifive: ccache: Add StarFive JH7110 support Hal Feng
2022-12-20 21:14   ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-20  1:12 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] riscv: dts: starfive: Add initial StarFive JH7110 device tree Hal Feng
2022-12-20 10:10   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-12-25 10:31     ` Hal Feng
2022-12-25 11:56       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-12-20 21:31   ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-25 14:31     ` Hal Feng
2022-12-27 20:58       ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-28 22:48   ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-29  5:25     ` Icenowy Zheng
2022-12-29  9:02       ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-01  7:53         ` Hal Feng
2023-02-01  7:31       ` Hal Feng
2023-02-01  7:21     ` Hal Feng [this message]
2023-02-01  8:21       ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-02 18:56         ` Hal Feng
2023-02-02 19:41           ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-09 11:11             ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-13  9:41               ` Hal Feng
2023-02-13 10:07                 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-14  2:37                   ` Hal Feng
2023-02-15  3:07             ` Hal Feng
2023-02-15  7:42               ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-15  7:59                 ` Conor Dooley
2023-01-31  2:00   ` Hal Feng
2023-01-31  6:17     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-02  2:42       ` Hal Feng
2023-02-02  6:19         ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-20  1:12 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] riscv: dts: starfive: Add StarFive JH7110 VisionFive 2 board " Hal Feng
2022-12-20 21:26   ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-23  3:12     ` Hal Feng
2022-12-28 22:49       ` Conor Dooley
2023-01-10 17:59   ` Conor Dooley
2023-01-18 23:43     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-14  9:53   ` Emil Renner Berthing
2023-02-15 14:03     ` Hal Feng
2023-02-16  9:27       ` Emil Renner Berthing
2023-02-16  9:50         ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-16 10:09           ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-16 10:32             ` Emil Renner Berthing
2023-02-16 12:27               ` Hal Feng
2023-02-16 13:02                 ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-26 23:01 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Basic device tree support for StarFive JH7110 RISC-V SoC Conor Dooley
2022-12-27  7:58   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-12-27 14:20     ` Conor Dooley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c507e0b2-5ca3-cffe-55d2-873ed8c24e3d@starfivetech.com \
    --to=hal.feng@starfivetech.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=ben.dooks@sifive.com \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).