From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: "Tilki, Ibrahim" <Ibrahim.Tilki@analog.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: "a.zummo@towertech.it" <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
"jdelvare@suse.com" <jdelvare@suse.com>,
"linux@roeck-us.net" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
"linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"Arslanbenzer, Zeynep" <Zeynep.Arslanbenzer@analog.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: rtc: add bindings for max313xx RTCs
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 09:40:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c573ae8d-f2ee-403f-e096-eec4b31c682f@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM8PR03MB6247691C7AD890FA486A5955962D9@DM8PR03MB6247.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
On 21/10/2022 09:05, Tilki, Ibrahim wrote:
>> On 21/10/2022 11:44:12+0000, Tilki, Ibrahim wrote:
>>>>> + interrupt-names:
>>>>> + description: |
>>>>> + Name of the interrupt pin of the RTC used for IRQ. Not required for
>>>>> + RTCs that only have single interrupt pin available. Some of the RTCs
>>>>> + share interrupt pins with clock input/output pins.
>>>>> + minItems: 1
>>>>> + items:
>>>>> + - enum: [INTA, INTB]
>>>>> + - enum: [INTA, INTB]
>>>>> +
>>>>
>>>> I don't think this is right, what this is doing is essentially pinmuxing
>>>> interrupts versus clocks. What happens if you want INTB but this goes
>>>> directly to a PMIC instead of the SoC?
>>>> It is not something you can express with your current bindings.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why would a user want INTB when it is not connected to SoC?
>>> User can specify none, either one or both of the interrupt pins.
>>> I don't see what the problem here is.
>>>
>>
>> the interrupt pin may be connected to a PMIC that is able to start or
>> wake up the platform. In that case, the user would not have any
>> interrupt-names and your driver will fail to mux the interrupt on INTB.
>> Please fix.
>
> Interrupt muxing depends on the clock configuration, not the interrupt-names property.
> Devices don't support muxing the alarm interrupt independently.
>
> For example in the case of max31329, alarm interrupt is muxed into INTA by default.
> Alarm interrupt is muxed into INTB pin if and only if clkin is enabled.\
Just to be sure: are you now describing hardware or Linux driver behavior?
>
> This means that if a user wants the alarm interrupt on INTB pin, they have to
> provide a clock input through "clocks" property. If that is the case, they can provide
> an interrupt for INTB pin, otherwise the alarm feature of the rtc gets disabled.
>
> Side note: Some devices have 2 Alarms but Alarm2 does not have a register for
> matching "seconds" so only Alarm1 is used by the driver.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-21 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-19 13:39 [PATCH 1/2] drivers: rtc: add max313xx series rtc driver Ibrahim Tilki
2022-10-19 13:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: rtc: add bindings for max313xx RTCs Ibrahim Tilki
2022-10-19 14:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-10-19 15:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-10-20 14:25 ` Tilki, Ibrahim
2022-10-20 15:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-10-20 21:13 ` Alexandre Belloni
2022-10-21 11:44 ` Tilki, Ibrahim
2022-10-21 12:29 ` Alexandre Belloni
2022-10-21 13:05 ` Tilki, Ibrahim
2022-10-21 13:40 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2022-10-21 13:56 ` Tilki, Ibrahim
2022-10-19 15:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] drivers: rtc: add max313xx series rtc driver Guenter Roeck
2022-10-20 14:47 ` Tilki, Ibrahim
2022-10-20 18:57 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-10-20 21:01 ` Alexandre Belloni
2022-10-21 8:34 ` kernel test robot
2022-10-22 3:15 ` kernel test robot
2022-10-22 6:07 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c573ae8d-f2ee-403f-e096-eec4b31c682f@linaro.org \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=Ibrahim.Tilki@analog.com \
--cc=Zeynep.Arslanbenzer@analog.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).