From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] of: unittest: overlay: ensure proper alignment of copied FDT
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 17:53:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c625202a-0530-adbd-d4f8-0935d3ed37e2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b73965c7-e975-6c48-3367-411f6c754181@roeck-us.net>
On 4/8/21 4:54 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 4/8/21 2:28 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> Applying now so this gets into linux-next this week.
>>
> The patch doesn't apply on top of today's -next; it conflicts
> with "of: properly check for error returned by fdt_get_name()".
>
> I reverted that patch and applied this one, and the DT unittests
> run with it on openrisc. I do get a single test failure, but I that
> is a different problem (possibly with the test case itself).
>
> ### dt-test ### FAIL of_unittest_dma_ranges_one():923 of_dma_get_range: wrong DMA addr 0x00000000
> (expecting 100000000) on node /testcase-data/address-tests/bus@80000000/device@1000
That is a known regression on the target that I use for testing (and
has been since 5.10-rc1) - the 8074 dragonboard, arm 32. No
one else has reported it on the list, so even though I want to debug
and fix it "promptly", other tasks have had higher priority. In my
notes I list two suspect commits:
e0d072782c73 dma-mapping: introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset
0a0f0d8be76d dma-mapping: split <linux/dma-mapping.h>
I think that was purely based on looking at the list of commits that
may have touched OF dma. I have not done a bisect.
One specific report of not seeing the FAIL was Vireshk on 5.11-rc6 with
a Hikey board.
>
> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Thanks for testing!
>
> Guenter
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-08 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-08 20:45 [PATCH v4 1/1] of: unittest: overlay: ensure proper alignment of copied FDT frowand.list
2021-04-08 21:28 ` Rob Herring
2021-04-08 21:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-04-08 22:53 ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2021-04-09 2:20 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-04-09 3:59 ` Frank Rowand
2021-04-08 22:40 ` Frank Rowand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c625202a-0530-adbd-d4f8-0935d3ed37e2@gmail.com \
--to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).