From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jacek Anaszewski Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mfd: ti-lmu: Remove LM3532 backlight driver references Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 22:11:00 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20190321142838.22985-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20190321142838.22985-3-dmurphy@ti.com> <8769a95d-179f-6219-0a63-9dd623cdd297@gmail.com> <20190325075317.GW4731@dell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190325075317.GW4731@dell> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Jones Cc: Dan Murphy , robh+dt@kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz, tony@atomide.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 3/25/19 8:53 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Sat, 23 Mar 2019, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > >> Hi Lee, >> >> Can we have your ack for this going via LED tree, please? > > Patch looks okay. > > You can take it through the LED, but if you do I will need you to send > me a pull-request to a minimised immutable branch please. > > If you cannot do this, I can apply the set and provide the same to > you. > > If you choose the former: > > Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones > > Please let me know what you decide > I've been exposing integration branches in the past, but after Linus' message [0] I have my doubts now. I wonder if it wouldn't make more sense if I just took the patches, and you'd cherry-pick them only in case such a need occurs. This way we would avoid this whole merge noise, which in an optimistic and very plausible case will not be needed at all. [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/19/1104 -- Best regards, Jacek Anaszewski