Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: pm7250b: make SID configurable

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 10/05/2023 08:47, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Fri Apr 7, 2023 at 10:27 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 07/04/2023 09:45, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>> Like other Qualcomm PMICs the PM7250B can be used on different addresses
>>> on the SPMI bus. Use similar defines like the PMK8350 to make this
>>> possible.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
>>>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi
>>> index daa6f1d30efa..eeb476edc79a 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi
>>> @@ -7,6 +7,15 @@
>>>  #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>>>  #include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h>
>>>  
>>> +/* This PMIC can be configured to be at different SIDs */
>>> +#ifndef PM7250B_SID
>>> +	#define PM7250B_SID 2
>>
>> Drop indentation, although anyway I am against this. Please don't bring
>> new patterns of this at least till we settle previous discussion.
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/46658cbb-fff5-e98b-fdad-88fa683a9c75@linaro.org/
> 
> What's the outcome of the discussion? For this PMIC it's totally enough
> to have the SID configurable like in this patch, I don't think this PMIC
> will be included twice in a board - at least I'm not aware of such a
> configuration.

We did not reach consensus and I still disagree with complex macros or
macros depending on order of inclusion.


Best regards,
Krzysztof