[PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: display: bridge: ldb: Add i.MX6SX support

[PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: display: bridge: ldb: Add i.MX6SX support

[Fabio Estevam]

From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>

i.MX6SX has a single LVDS port and share a similar LDB_CTRL register
layout with i.MX8MP and i.MX93.

Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
---
Changes since v1:
- Do not duplicate the entire if. (Krzysztof)

 .../devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/fsl,ldb.yaml          | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/fsl,ldb.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/fsl,ldb.yaml
index 6e0e3ba9b49e..07388bf2b90d 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/fsl,ldb.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/fsl,ldb.yaml
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ description: |
 properties:
   compatible:
     enum:
+      - fsl,imx6sx-ldb
       - fsl,imx8mp-ldb
       - fsl,imx93-ldb
 
@@ -64,7 +65,9 @@ allOf:
       properties:
         compatible:
           contains:
-            const: fsl,imx93-ldb
+            enum:
+              - fsl,imx6sx-ldb
+              - fsl,imx93-ldb
     then:
       properties:
         ports:
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH v2 2/2] drm/bridge: fsl-ldb: Add i.MX6SX support

[Fabio Estevam]

From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>

i.MX6SX has a single LVDS port and share a similar LDB_CTRL register layout
with i.MX8MP and i.MX93.

There is no LVDS CTRL register on the i.MX6SX, so only write to
this register on the appropriate SoCs.

Add support for the i.MX6SX LDB.

Tested on a imx6sx-sdb board with a Hannstar HSD100PXN1 LVDS panel
and also on a custom i.MX6SX-based board.

Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
---
Changes since v1:
- None

 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c
index 450b352914f4..f8e5d8ab98e3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
 #define LVDS_CTRL_VBG_ADJ_MASK			GENMASK(19, 17)
 
 enum fsl_ldb_devtype {
+	IMX6SX_LDB,
 	IMX8MP_LDB,
 	IMX93_LDB,
 };
@@ -64,9 +65,14 @@ struct fsl_ldb_devdata {
 	u32 ldb_ctrl;
 	u32 lvds_ctrl;
 	bool lvds_en_bit;
+	bool not_lvds_ctrl;
 };
 
 static const struct fsl_ldb_devdata fsl_ldb_devdata[] = {
+	[IMX6SX_LDB] = {
+		.ldb_ctrl = 0x18,
+		.not_lvds_ctrl = true,
+	},
 	[IMX8MP_LDB] = {
 		.ldb_ctrl = 0x5c,
 		.lvds_ctrl = 0x128,
@@ -202,6 +208,9 @@ static void fsl_ldb_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 
 	regmap_write(fsl_ldb->regmap, fsl_ldb->devdata->ldb_ctrl, reg);
 
+	if (fsl_ldb->devdata->not_lvds_ctrl)
+		return;
+
 	/* Program LVDS_CTRL */
 	reg = LVDS_CTRL_CC_ADJ(2) | LVDS_CTRL_PRE_EMPH_EN |
 	      LVDS_CTRL_PRE_EMPH_ADJ(3) | LVDS_CTRL_VBG_EN;
@@ -228,7 +237,8 @@ static void fsl_ldb_atomic_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 		regmap_write(fsl_ldb->regmap, fsl_ldb->devdata->lvds_ctrl,
 			     LVDS_CTRL_LVDS_EN);
 	else
-		regmap_write(fsl_ldb->regmap, fsl_ldb->devdata->lvds_ctrl, 0);
+		if (!fsl_ldb->devdata->not_lvds_ctrl)
+			regmap_write(fsl_ldb->regmap, fsl_ldb->devdata->lvds_ctrl, 0);
 	regmap_write(fsl_ldb->regmap, fsl_ldb->devdata->ldb_ctrl, 0);
 
 	clk_disable_unprepare(fsl_ldb->clk);
@@ -355,6 +365,8 @@ static void fsl_ldb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 }
 
 static const struct of_device_id fsl_ldb_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-ldb",
+	  .data = &fsl_ldb_devdata[IMX6SX_LDB], },
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-ldb",
 	  .data = &fsl_ldb_devdata[IMX8MP_LDB], },
 	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx93-ldb",
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: display: bridge: ldb: Add i.MX6SX support

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 30/03/2023 12:42, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
> 
> i.MX6SX has a single LVDS port and share a similar LDB_CTRL register
> layout with i.MX8MP and i.MX93.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Do not duplicate the entire if. (Krzysztof)

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/bridge: fsl-ldb: Add i.MX6SX support

[neil.armstrong]

On 30/03/2023 12:42, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
> 
> i.MX6SX has a single LVDS port and share a similar LDB_CTRL register layout
> with i.MX8MP and i.MX93.
> 
> There is no LVDS CTRL register on the i.MX6SX, so only write to
> this register on the appropriate SoCs.
> 
> Add support for the i.MX6SX LDB.
> 
> Tested on a imx6sx-sdb board with a Hannstar HSD100PXN1 LVDS panel
> and also on a custom i.MX6SX-based board.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - None
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c
> index 450b352914f4..f8e5d8ab98e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
>   #define LVDS_CTRL_VBG_ADJ_MASK			GENMASK(19, 17)
>   
>   enum fsl_ldb_devtype {
> +	IMX6SX_LDB,
>   	IMX8MP_LDB,
>   	IMX93_LDB,
>   };
> @@ -64,9 +65,14 @@ struct fsl_ldb_devdata {
>   	u32 ldb_ctrl;
>   	u32 lvds_ctrl;
>   	bool lvds_en_bit;
> +	bool not_lvds_ctrl;
>   };
>   
>   static const struct fsl_ldb_devdata fsl_ldb_devdata[] = {
> +	[IMX6SX_LDB] = {
> +		.ldb_ctrl = 0x18,
> +		.not_lvds_ctrl = true,
> +	},
>   	[IMX8MP_LDB] = {
>   		.ldb_ctrl = 0x5c,
>   		.lvds_ctrl = 0x128,
> @@ -202,6 +208,9 @@ static void fsl_ldb_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>   
>   	regmap_write(fsl_ldb->regmap, fsl_ldb->devdata->ldb_ctrl, reg);
>   
> +	if (fsl_ldb->devdata->not_lvds_ctrl)
> +		return;
> +
>   	/* Program LVDS_CTRL */
>   	reg = LVDS_CTRL_CC_ADJ(2) | LVDS_CTRL_PRE_EMPH_EN |
>   	      LVDS_CTRL_PRE_EMPH_ADJ(3) | LVDS_CTRL_VBG_EN;
> @@ -228,7 +237,8 @@ static void fsl_ldb_atomic_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>   		regmap_write(fsl_ldb->regmap, fsl_ldb->devdata->lvds_ctrl,
>   			     LVDS_CTRL_LVDS_EN);
>   	else
> -		regmap_write(fsl_ldb->regmap, fsl_ldb->devdata->lvds_ctrl, 0);
> +		if (!fsl_ldb->devdata->not_lvds_ctrl)
> +			regmap_write(fsl_ldb->regmap, fsl_ldb->devdata->lvds_ctrl, 0);
>   	regmap_write(fsl_ldb->regmap, fsl_ldb->devdata->ldb_ctrl, 0);
>   
>   	clk_disable_unprepare(fsl_ldb->clk);
> @@ -355,6 +365,8 @@ static void fsl_ldb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   }
>   
>   static const struct of_device_id fsl_ldb_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-ldb",
> +	  .data = &fsl_ldb_devdata[IMX6SX_LDB], },
>   	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-ldb",
>   	  .data = &fsl_ldb_devdata[IMX8MP_LDB], },
>   	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx93-ldb",

Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/bridge: fsl-ldb: Add i.MX6SX support

[Marek Vasut]

On 3/30/23 12:42, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
> 
> i.MX6SX has a single LVDS port and share a similar LDB_CTRL register layout
> with i.MX8MP and i.MX93.
> 
> There is no LVDS CTRL register on the i.MX6SX, so only write to
> this register on the appropriate SoCs.
> 
> Add support for the i.MX6SX LDB.
> 
> Tested on a imx6sx-sdb board with a Hannstar HSD100PXN1 LVDS panel
> and also on a custom i.MX6SX-based board.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - None
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c
> index 450b352914f4..f8e5d8ab98e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
>   #define LVDS_CTRL_VBG_ADJ_MASK			GENMASK(19, 17)
>   
>   enum fsl_ldb_devtype {
> +	IMX6SX_LDB,
>   	IMX8MP_LDB,
>   	IMX93_LDB,
>   };
> @@ -64,9 +65,14 @@ struct fsl_ldb_devdata {
>   	u32 ldb_ctrl;
>   	u32 lvds_ctrl;
>   	bool lvds_en_bit;
> +	bool not_lvds_ctrl;

You might want to rename this one to something like 
"composite_control_reg" since the MX6SX only has one LDB control 
register instead of two like the newer SoCs. But that's optional change.

Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: display: bridge: ldb: Add i.MX6SX support

[Marek Vasut]

On 3/30/23 12:42, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
> 
> i.MX6SX has a single LVDS port and share a similar LDB_CTRL register
> layout with i.MX8MP and i.MX93.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>

Nit: you are not adding 'support' for the IP here, you are documenting 
bindings in this patch. The support is added in 2/2 .

Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>