From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Vishnu Santhosh <vishnu.santhosh@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Kumar Patro <bibek.patro@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Komal Bajaj <komal.bajaj@oss.qualcomm.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Deepak Kumar Singh <deepak.singh@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,shikra-pas: Allow bam-dmux subnode
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 17:38:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cbc62091-ace6-4e4b-8cae-fdf9b83b118d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c1f8b5bc-6d50-42bc-b671-7e91d76cb975@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 04/08/2026 17:18, Vishnu Santhosh wrote:
>
> On 30-07-2026 12:53 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 02:21:01PM +0530, Vishnu Santhosh wrote:
>>> The BAM-DMUX node lives as a direct child of the modem PAS remoteproc
>> No, it does not. Look:
>>
>> $ git describe
>> next-20260729
>> $ git grep bam-dmux
>> No child node shown
>
> The commit message overstated this. The dt changes are yet to be merged.
> I'll correct it in v3.
>
>>
>> Why isn't this part of Shikra remoteproc commit/patch? How any code
>> could pass validation otherwise?
>
> By the time the BAM-DMUX support was brought up and validated, the
> remoteproc changes was already in a stable state. Therefore, the
No, it was not in stable state if it was not merged.
> bam-dmux change is being submitted separately.
No, bindings should be complete.
>
>>> node, but qcom,shikra-pas.yaml has unevaluatedProperties: false and
>>> does not list bam-dmux, so any DT adding this subnode fails schema
>>> validation.
>> Fails how? How can I reproduce the error?
>>
>> There is no bam-dma in this binding example.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>
> Did you mean bam-dmux (the property this patch adds)? If so, I'll add
> an example with a bam-dmux subnode in v3.
You claim something fails. Prove it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-29 8:51 [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,shikra-pas: Allow bam-dmux subnode Vishnu Santhosh
2026-07-30 7:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-04 15:18 ` Vishnu Santhosh
2026-08-04 15:38 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2026-08-05 9:46 ` Vishnu Santhosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cbc62091-ace6-4e4b-8cae-fdf9b83b118d@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=bibek.patro@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=deepak.singh@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=komal.bajaj@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=vishnu.santhosh@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox