From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
To: Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@ti.com>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-phy@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 4/4] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Add support for setting mux
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 19:14:36 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc28796e-2ebc-4aad-ffc2-4fe570b269db@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211122125624.6431-5-a-govindraju@ti.com>
Hi Aswath,
On 22/11/21 6:26 pm, Aswath Govindraju wrote:
> On some boards, for routing CAN signals from controller to transceiver,
> muxes might need to be set. Therefore, add support for setting the mux by
> reading the mux-controls property from the device tree node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c b/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c
> index 6f3fe37dee0e..15056b9d68ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #include<linux/module.h>
> #include<linux/gpio.h>
> #include<linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/mux/consumer.h>
>
> struct can_transceiver_data {
> u32 flags;
> @@ -21,13 +22,23 @@ struct can_transceiver_phy {
> struct phy *generic_phy;
> struct gpio_desc *standby_gpio;
> struct gpio_desc *enable_gpio;
> + struct mux_control *mux_ctrl;
> };
>
> /* Power on function */
> static int can_transceiver_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> {
> + int ret;
> struct can_transceiver_phy *can_transceiver_phy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>
> + if (can_transceiver_phy->mux_ctrl) {
> + ret = mux_control_select(can_transceiver_phy->mux_ctrl,
> + mux_control_enable_state(can_transceiver_phy->mux_ctrl));
Would need 'select MULTIPLEXER' in Kconfig.
Thanks,
Kishon
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&phy->dev, "Failed to select CAN mux: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> if (can_transceiver_phy->standby_gpio)
> gpiod_set_value_cansleep(can_transceiver_phy->standby_gpio, 0);
> if (can_transceiver_phy->enable_gpio)
> @@ -45,6 +56,8 @@ static int can_transceiver_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
> gpiod_set_value_cansleep(can_transceiver_phy->standby_gpio, 1);
> if (can_transceiver_phy->enable_gpio)
> gpiod_set_value_cansleep(can_transceiver_phy->enable_gpio, 0);
> + if (can_transceiver_phy->mux_ctrl)
> + mux_control_deselect(can_transceiver_phy->mux_ctrl);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -95,6 +108,19 @@ static int can_transceiver_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> match = of_match_node(can_transceiver_phy_ids, pdev->dev.of_node);
> drvdata = match->data;
>
> + if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "mux-controls")) {
> + struct mux_control *control;
> + int ret;
> +
> + control = devm_mux_control_get(dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(control)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(control);
> + dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "failed to get mux\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(control);
> + }
> + can_transceiver_phy->mux_ctrl = control;
> + }
> +
> phy = devm_phy_create(dev, dev->of_node,
> &can_transceiver_phy_ops);
> if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-22 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-22 12:56 [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] MUX: Add support for reading enable state from DT Aswath Govindraju
2021-11-22 12:56 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/4] dt-bindings: mux: Increase the number of arguments in mux-controls Aswath Govindraju
2021-11-22 12:56 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/4] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document mux-controls property Aswath Govindraju
2021-11-22 12:56 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/4] mux: Add support for reading mux enable state from DT Aswath Govindraju
2021-11-22 18:59 ` Peter Rosin
2021-11-23 4:14 ` Aswath Govindraju
2021-11-23 4:29 ` Aswath Govindraju
2021-11-22 12:56 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/4] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Add support for setting mux Aswath Govindraju
2021-11-22 13:06 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-11-22 13:12 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-11-22 13:20 ` Aswath Govindraju
2021-11-22 13:30 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-11-22 13:44 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I [this message]
2021-11-23 8:14 ` [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] MUX: Add support for reading enable state from DT Aswath Govindraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cc28796e-2ebc-4aad-ffc2-4fe570b269db@ti.com \
--to=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=a-govindraju@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=peda@axentia.se \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).