public inbox for devicetree@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ivan Gorinov <ivan.gorinov@intel.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	geert@linux-m68k.org, laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: devicetree: fix config option around x86_flattree_get_config()
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 12:17:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd3d7bd4-5235-2c1a-b22b-a3a3756d6704@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4284204.nJkDQ6O5Aj@avalon>

Hi x86 Maintainers,

On 03/03/18 01:17, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Frank,
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> On Saturday, 3 March 2018 06:12:26 EET frowand.list@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
>>
>> x86_flattree_get_config() is incorrectly protected by
>> ifdef CONFIG_OF_FLATTREE.  It uses of_get_flat_dt_size(), which
>> only exists if CONFIG_OF_EARLY_FLATTREE.  This issue has not
>> been exposed previously because OF_FLATTREE did not occur unless
>> it was selected by OF_EARLY_FLATTREE.  A devicetree overlay change
>> is selecting OF_FLATTREE directly instead of indirectly enabling
>> it by selecting OF_EARLY_FLATTREE.
>>
>> This problem was exposed by a randconfig generated by the kbuild
>> test robot, where Platform OLPC was enabled.  OLPC selects
>> OF_PROMTREE instead of OF_EARLY_FLATREE.  The only other x86
>> platform that selects OF is X86_INTEL_CE, which does select
>> OF_EARLY_FLATTREE.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
>> ---
>>
>> The devicetree overlay change is in patch 1/4 of the series:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/2/979
>>
>> The pull request for the patch series that triggered the kbuild
>> test robot is:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/2/1065
>>
>>  arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c b/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c
>> index 25de5f6ca997..45416826f6ee 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c
>> @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static void __init dtb_apic_setup(void)
>>  	dtb_ioapic_setup();
>>  }
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF_FLATTREE
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_EARLY_FLATTREE
>>  static void __init x86_flattree_get_config(void)
>>  {
>>  	u32 size, map_len;
> 
> This looks good to me. Could you respin the pull request with this patch 
> included ? I need to send a pull request for a patch series based on your 
> overlay changes, and I'd rather avoid breaking the build :-)
> 

I sent this patch to the x86 maintainers and to Rob because of a patch
series that is modifying arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c, in
x86_flattree_get_config() [1].  It does not look like my patch will
conflict with that patch at the moment, but it is possible that a conflict
could develop as that patch is developed.

I will add this patch to my devictree pull request, and ask the x86
maintainers to ack it and watch for possible conflicts as patch [1]
is further developed.


[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/1/1005
    [PATCH v3 1/3] x86: devicetree: call early_init_dt_verify()

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-03 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-03  4:12 [PATCH] x86: devicetree: fix config option around x86_flattree_get_config() frowand.list
2018-03-03  9:17 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-03 20:17   ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2018-03-04  7:21     ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cd3d7bd4-5235-2c1a-b22b-a3a3756d6704@gmail.com \
    --to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=ivan.gorinov@intel.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox