From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
To: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@ti.com>,
lpieralisi@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, kw@linux.com,
bhelgaas@google.com, krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org,
vigneshr@ti.com, tjoseph@cadence.com,
sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com, pthombar@cadence.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] PCI: j721e: Add per platform maximum lane settings
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 14:27:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd9051ca-9f79-31fc-870d-04dce5139ca9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221124081221.1206167-3-mranostay@ti.com>
Hi Matt,
On 24/11/2022 10:12, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> Various platforms have different maximum amount of lanes that can be
> selected. Add max_lanes to struct j721e_pcie to allow for detection of this
> which is needed to calculate the needed bitmask size for the possible lane
> count.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pci-j721e.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pci-j721e.c b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pci-j721e.c
> index cc83a8925ce0..8990f58d64d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pci-j721e.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pci-j721e.c
> @@ -47,8 +47,6 @@ enum link_status {
>
> #define GENERATION_SEL_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
>
> -#define MAX_LANES 2
> -
> struct j721e_pcie {
> struct cdns_pcie *cdns_pcie;
> struct clk *refclk;
> @@ -71,6 +69,7 @@ struct j721e_pcie_data {
> unsigned int quirk_disable_flr:1;
> u32 linkdown_irq_regfield;
> unsigned int byte_access_allowed:1;
> + unsigned int max_lanes;
> };
>
> static inline u32 j721e_pcie_user_readl(struct j721e_pcie *pcie, u32 offset)
> @@ -290,11 +289,13 @@ static const struct j721e_pcie_data j721e_pcie_rc_data = {
> .quirk_retrain_flag = true,
> .byte_access_allowed = false,
> .linkdown_irq_regfield = LINK_DOWN,
> + .max_lanes = 2,
> };
>
> static const struct j721e_pcie_data j721e_pcie_ep_data = {
> .mode = PCI_MODE_EP,
> .linkdown_irq_regfield = LINK_DOWN,
> + .max_lanes = 2,
> };
>
> static const struct j721e_pcie_data j7200_pcie_rc_data = {
> @@ -302,23 +303,27 @@ static const struct j721e_pcie_data j7200_pcie_rc_data = {
> .quirk_detect_quiet_flag = true,
> .linkdown_irq_regfield = J7200_LINK_DOWN,
> .byte_access_allowed = true,
> + .max_lanes = 2,
> };
>
> static const struct j721e_pcie_data j7200_pcie_ep_data = {
> .mode = PCI_MODE_EP,
> .quirk_detect_quiet_flag = true,
> .quirk_disable_flr = true,
> + .max_lanes = 2,
> };
>
> static const struct j721e_pcie_data am64_pcie_rc_data = {
> .mode = PCI_MODE_RC,
> .linkdown_irq_regfield = J7200_LINK_DOWN,
> .byte_access_allowed = true,
> + .max_lanes = 1,
> };
>
> static const struct j721e_pcie_data am64_pcie_ep_data = {
> .mode = PCI_MODE_EP,
> .linkdown_irq_regfield = J7200_LINK_DOWN,
> + .max_lanes = 1,
> };
>
> static const struct of_device_id of_j721e_pcie_match[] = {
> @@ -432,7 +437,7 @@ static int j721e_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pcie->user_cfg_base = base;
>
> ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "num-lanes", &num_lanes);
> - if (ret || num_lanes > MAX_LANES)
> + if (ret || num_lanes > data->max_lanes)
> num_lanes = 1;
num_lanes = data->max_lanes; ?
Should we also print an error message saying that invalid num-lanes
was supplied in device tree?
Is it better to error out of probe?
> pcie->num_lanes = num_lanes;
>
cheers,
-roger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-25 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-24 8:12 [PATCH v7 0/5] PCI: add 4x lane support for pci-j721e controllers Matt Ranostay
2022-11-24 8:12 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] dt-bindings: PCI: ti,j721e-pci-*: add checks for num-lanes Matt Ranostay
2022-11-26 14:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-11-24 8:12 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] PCI: j721e: Add per platform maximum lane settings Matt Ranostay
2022-11-25 12:27 ` Roger Quadros [this message]
2022-11-24 8:12 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] PCI: j721e: Add PCIe 4x lane selection support Matt Ranostay
2022-11-25 12:31 ` Roger Quadros
2023-02-02 16:09 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-11-24 8:12 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] dt-bindings: PCI: ti,j721e-pci-*: add j784s4-pci-* compatible strings Matt Ranostay
2022-11-26 14:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-11-24 8:12 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] PCI: j721e: add j784s4 PCIe configuration Matt Ranostay
2022-11-25 12:32 ` Roger Quadros
2022-11-25 20:08 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cd9051ca-9f79-31fc-870d-04dce5139ca9@kernel.org \
--to=rogerq@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mranostay@ti.com \
--cc=pthombar@cadence.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com \
--cc=tjoseph@cadence.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).