From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C003C2D0DB for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:52:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6207A214D8 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:52:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=st.com header.i=@st.com header.b="X/iiA29C" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728465AbgA0Nwr (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:52:47 -0500 Received: from mx08-00178001.pphosted.com ([91.207.212.93]:54272 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726303AbgA0Nwq (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:52:46 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0046661.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 00RDqbnt009301; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 14:52:37 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=st.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=STMicroelectronics; bh=O6+dl2h2jXKNX+fyEpk/L/rLP8vjpdo1SJpvyPqDs8o=; b=X/iiA29CNOrjDNNUARjzkyJpC1jddl3AsBxKBhiHW+SWoftFjY8Gi4idGPQEkJG5183x krj9qylWMsE8A6gNOBlZqR6kDZrYQxmgYytDDj5hc2gFbkwdeZXnicL6BmcgfKUmlkS6 48/Ua5wooQ/Z1K5UN5otgsaMIwZSvUyBejfnvh2CuMlSiLWsNZLH0Cue+aWsDbs2G+xe AqvY1Wu2uxfxnMhZ+I30pSzC53NG16S6S8pYprESRWtO5t6nIIDl1SFxMtvJIWY4ugk4 qa1FE1Yehgv2YPYf1ZJdHV3obXWB/iF8jmS4pOEK97Bk4ybbfI35+Hs/KWOhFRNnm3vu Zw== Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2xrdek90x4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 27 Jan 2020 14:52:37 +0100 Received: from euls16034.sgp.st.com (euls16034.sgp.st.com [10.75.44.20]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 15257100038; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 14:52:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (sfhdag6node1.st.com [10.75.127.16]) by euls16034.sgp.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 00C312B2F22; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 14:52:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from lmecxl0923.lme.st.com (10.75.127.49) by SFHDAG6NODE1.st.com (10.75.127.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 14:52:29 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] mmc: mmci: sdmmc: add sdr104 support To: Ulf Hansson CC: Rob Herring , Srinivas Kandagatla , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Linux ARM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , DTML , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , References: <20200110134823.14882-1-ludovic.barre@st.com> <6d859def-351e-abd7-0d5f-962ad935dff2@st.com> From: Ludovic BARRE Message-ID: Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 14:52:28 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.75.127.49] X-ClientProxiedBy: SFHDAG2NODE3.st.com (10.75.127.6) To SFHDAG6NODE1.st.com (10.75.127.16) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.572 definitions=2020-01-27_02:2020-01-24,2020-01-27 signatures=0 Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org hi Ulf Le 1/24/20 à 2:19 PM, Ulf Hansson a écrit : > On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 at 13:55, Ludovic BARRE wrote: >> >> hi Ulf >> >> Just a "gentleman ping" on this series >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/392 > > I was just reviewing :-) Thanks for pinging! > > One overall comment is that I think you can try to work a bit on the > changelogs. In some cases you described what the patch does, which is > good, but it may lack information about *why* the change is wanted. Ok, I try to add a comment to *why* > > Overall, the series looks nice. > > Kind regards > Uffe >