From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Oreoluwa Babatunde <oreoluwa.babatunde@oss.qualcomm.com>,
robh@kernel.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com
Cc: saravanak@google.com, quic_obabatun@quicinc.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, william.zhang@broadcom.com,
kernel@oss.qualcomm.com, will@kernel.org, djakov@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: reserved_mem: Restructure call site for dma_contiguous_early_fixup()
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 18:17:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ceedcc51-7a4e-4da0-bdcd-429e7c212d19@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250708165627.845295-1-oreoluwa.babatunde@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 08/07/2025 5:56 pm, Oreoluwa Babatunde wrote:
> Restructure the call site for dma_contiguous_early_fixup() to
> where the reserved_mem nodes are being parsed from the DT so that
> dma_mmu_remap[] is populated before dma_contiguous_remap() is called.
>
> Fixes: 8a6e02d0c00e ("of: reserved_mem: Restructure how the reserved memory regions are processed")
> Signed-off-by: Oreoluwa Babatunde <oreoluwa.babatunde@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> kernel/dma/contiguous.c | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> index 77016c0cc296..132d2c66cafc 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> #include <linux/memblock.h>
> #include <linux/kmemleak.h>
> #include <linux/cma.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-map-ops.h>
>
> #include "of_private.h"
>
> @@ -175,13 +176,17 @@ static int __init __reserved_mem_reserve_reg(unsigned long node,
> base = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, &prop);
> size = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_size_cells, &prop);
>
> - if (size &&
> - early_init_dt_reserve_memory(base, size, nomap) == 0)
> + if (size && early_init_dt_reserve_memory(base, size, nomap) == 0) {
> + /* Architecture specific contiguous memory fixup. */
> + if (of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, "shared-dma-pool"))
Surely this is now going to call the fixup for *all* "shared-dma-pool"
reservations, rather than just the ones which are specifically CMA
regions? That seems potentially bad in a number of ways.
Thanks,
Robin.
> + dma_contiguous_early_fixup(base, size);
> +
> pr_debug("Reserved memory: reserved region for node '%s': base %pa, size %lu MiB\n",
> uname, &base, (unsigned long)(size / SZ_1M));
> - else
> + } else {
> pr_err("Reserved memory: failed to reserve memory for node '%s': base %pa, size %lu MiB\n",
> uname, &base, (unsigned long)(size / SZ_1M));
> + }
>
> len -= t_len;
> }
> @@ -472,6 +477,9 @@ static int __init __reserved_mem_alloc_size(unsigned long node, const char *unam
> uname, (unsigned long)(size / SZ_1M));
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> + /* Architecture specific contiguous memory fixup. */
> + if (of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, "shared-dma-pool"))
> + dma_contiguous_early_fixup(base, size);
>
> /* Save region in the reserved_mem array */
> fdt_reserved_mem_save_node(node, uname, base, size);
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/contiguous.c b/kernel/dma/contiguous.c
> index 8df0dfaaca18..9e5d63efe7c5 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/contiguous.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/contiguous.c
> @@ -480,8 +480,6 @@ static int __init rmem_cma_setup(struct reserved_mem *rmem)
> pr_err("Reserved memory: unable to setup CMA region\n");
> return err;
> }
> - /* Architecture specific contiguous memory fixup. */
> - dma_contiguous_early_fixup(rmem->base, rmem->size);
>
> if (default_cma)
> dma_contiguous_default_area = cma;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-08 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-08 16:56 [PATCH] of: reserved_mem: Restructure call site for dma_contiguous_early_fixup() Oreoluwa Babatunde
2025-07-08 17:17 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2025-07-08 22:39 ` Oreoluwa Babatunde
2025-07-09 8:38 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ceedcc51-7a4e-4da0-bdcd-429e7c212d19@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=djakov@kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=oreoluwa.babatunde@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=quic_obabatun@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=william.zhang@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).