From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx08-00178001.pphosted.com (mx08-00178001.pphosted.com [91.207.212.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE95F15DBB3; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 07:20:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.207.212.93 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725261652; cv=none; b=b416Gj6ELbrQ5iL5rrrF+5xsrPD+RCuEa6gsDppruBIEKkZGbmTgcV7/xkfOpEos0BOoGCQCZg1Iy4LT7uqIjb+Nt/SSQFWIJv7f/UYyr3Q6UioinTmKQ9kaAnOQ5x/6kdzI57IdGIIvEyb8Bf8GwhIoYDxIlNnZJbd5e+bNOtU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725261652; c=relaxed/simple; bh=++hGo6b12+vxq83JdLH9ooYDjvTjt3PqY5WgAfKFms4=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=LR1gXHhZoOFDat+q2FT/oxCOLxmTGrk7FQWSG4gEGKZKpiIgqLAnunLybL17q4M5gBKC0nKIDdWXbHRNiC1FPwlT5z/b3NjBhFEXij4dKxQzILElgJdTTnu6fLbDZBwnGX/Mz+WmDz9k+4y4p50WMvzpnZU7tsEewCB6Rw1RF6Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=foss.st.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=foss.st.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=foss.st.com header.i=@foss.st.com header.b=gLjKyA66; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.207.212.93 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=foss.st.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=foss.st.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=foss.st.com header.i=@foss.st.com header.b="gLjKyA66" Received: from pps.filterd (m0369457.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 4824snrq008347; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 09:20:07 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foss.st.com; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s=selector1; bh= sLn8YX8O3WDqoWEd6Wy0yt1v1YptlaDbfBdJJeo6sw0=; b=gLjKyA66m6ulkqnY 9BvNbbR8zZoLSZ0gmKbPABqYi3hKbtGhMSnD1TT0+eHvXPGh3GgZTz0lFY2mjj6s 77ZuiokvGtQknaIbGPcrPOuYt1G7q49VbODXkpqeLVFiEn7ZotFmHXAotDr2FfBC zoyd6A9J3Mrvs5Pq0IoGWcwTqrjCaO2v9AZxwbdVhTZz8KAoiwjzaFETpA7uRcVd +Bf9K7Rge/UcM1FALM/zfaPjjBqYaEgsF4Qf1sb78dwj+qEit+Xc17wZ18/Xz3BP 93O+dtiiJyB1BHEJ9xpCCUbPNRoG0b0RJG9pFDfwYzcOh8qTTiW/LfPzkE9ZQxep q0b89w== Received: from beta.dmz-ap.st.com (beta.dmz-ap.st.com [138.198.100.35]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 41ce4j3eb4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 02 Sep 2024 09:20:07 +0200 (MEST) Received: from euls16034.sgp.st.com (euls16034.sgp.st.com [10.75.44.20]) by beta.dmz-ap.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 47CF240058; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 09:19:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (eqndag1node5.st.com [10.75.129.134]) by euls16034.sgp.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 0B84121D23A; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 09:18:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from SAFDAG1NODE1.st.com (10.75.90.17) by EQNDAG1NODE5.st.com (10.75.129.134) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.37; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 09:18:57 +0200 Received: from [10.48.86.121] (10.48.86.121) by SAFDAG1NODE1.st.com (10.75.90.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.37; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 09:18:57 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 09:18:56 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/7] remoteproc: core: Add TEE interface support for firmware release To: kernel test robot , Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier , Jens Wiklander , Rob Herring , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , Conor Dooley CC: , , , , , , References: <20240830095147.3538047-5-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> <202409010034.Tln3soEY-lkp@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Arnaud POULIQUEN Organization: STMicroelectronics In-Reply-To: <202409010034.Tln3soEY-lkp@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: EQNCAS1NODE4.st.com (10.75.129.82) To SAFDAG1NODE1.st.com (10.75.90.17) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.28.16 definitions=2024-09-01_06,2024-08-30_01,2024-05-17_01 On 8/31/24 18:43, kernel test robot wrote: > Hi Arnaud, > > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: > > [auto build test WARNING on 5be63fc19fcaa4c236b307420483578a56986a37] > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Arnaud-Pouliquen/remoteproc-core-Introduce-rproc_pa_to_va-helper/20240830-175609 > base: 5be63fc19fcaa4c236b307420483578a56986a37 > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240830095147.3538047-5-arnaud.pouliquen%40foss.st.com > patch subject: [PATCH v9 4/7] remoteproc: core: Add TEE interface support for firmware release > config: loongarch-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240901/202409010034.Tln3soEY-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240901/202409010034.Tln3soEY-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409010034.Tln3soEY-lkp@intel.com/ > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > In file included from drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:32: >>> include/linux/remoteproc_tee.h:52:12: warning: 'tee_rproc_parse_fw' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > 52 | static int tee_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > vim +/tee_rproc_parse_fw +52 include/linux/remoteproc_tee.h > > 498143a453d14e Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-08-30 51 > 498143a453d14e Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-08-30 @52 static int tee_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) > 498143a453d14e Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-08-30 53 { > 498143a453d14e Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-08-30 54 /* This shouldn't be possible */ > 498143a453d14e Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-08-30 55 WARN_ON(1); > 498143a453d14e Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-08-30 56 > 498143a453d14e Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-08-30 57 return 0; > 498143a453d14e Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-08-30 58 } > 498143a453d14e Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-08-30 59 > The inline attribute is missing. As it is a minor fix, I'm waiting for more reviews before fixing it in the next version. Regards, Arnaud