Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,spmi-pmic: add compatibles for pm4124-codec

[Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 2/11/26 6:43 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 02:24:25PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>> From: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@linaro.org>
>>
>> Qualcomm Agatti SoC has PM4125 PMIC, which includes audio codec.
>> Audio codec has TX and RX soundwire slave devices to connect to on-chip
>> soundwire master.
>>
>> Add missing qcom,pm4125-codec compatible to pattern of audio-codec node
>> properties in mfd qcom,spmi-pmic schema to complete the audio codec support.
>>
> 
> That's v6, not v1.
Thanks Krzysztof, I was skeptical about it before sending however it
made more sense to include that binding into this series which had 3 new
patches,which is why I started of with v1 again. Which can be easy for
review and dtb checks to not fail for the dts patches in this series.

Am happy to send it as v7 next time as a single patch if that is what is
prefered.



> 
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@linaro.org>
>> [Srini: reworked the patch]
> 
> Why? The v5 version was what we wanted. Why changing it?
> 
I looked at all the versions of this patch before sending out this one,
it sounded that you were not okay with the patch itself, may be that is
not true, you just wanted a clear commit log changed. I can send a new
version with updated comments as you requested. May be I miss
interpreted it your review on v5.

TBH, there are multiple ways to add this new child node bindings into
spmi bus.

Just from my understanding, why listing compatibles is preferred over
listing ref to child bindings?, while both serve the same purpose.

thanks,
Srini


> Anyway, same feedback.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>