From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.manjaro.org (mail.manjaro.org [116.203.91.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17E661A238F; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 13:47:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758980866; cv=none; b=tFCTSQ47lzWpGzl84/FuKuBl48dXiAjahcUlYKnIURkA07cyDojFH4FuE/aa5TP6x2LAYLe0iIi8P6gNnPzaTJN6nF66mXhRu11rfkYF8JQyVSwBi2tPb6EaHxlmK5t4m0M7Y+Is7yZKwEOpXGCS932SJswUnztWwRfsuJJ9UTk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758980866; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eM+SFxnTyTY5kFSJm4wguccBRruiQ5oSyGAxNi+yFM4=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=LaKZa6adBa6SkavBfqeHHgHh9AYTIbyCEINdw+iGBZFHzzFm6VZo4rUZiD6Tq4ESewLi1NgTQ+Z4GS7cxGOSC6zAW+5MrDFx+cr9kVlPlchd7QeqpTWWg1a4Lb2udxA+G2JuWtYKobmT7pjGdh6h7KVd++clNFep4LOSQPwn2H8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b=k1TkaTrK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b="k1TkaTrK" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=2021; t=1758980856; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=viO8D+Qu2R6riMUQBJZA4lci0O87eiHC/lld0s2EB4A=; b=k1TkaTrKrNDGCaTdjNAzJ54xvUbwa6oLdyeabtuQche1UzsO4we+X1IcKp6h0zBbBkwPKs lri59Pl1DSM0NoDtpcluC29zfICKCZ8lSyFHfOPSamPaUJuROwZ/uGt1nhG3J7J2NOe9Nb O/KIgDxmBszhbBzxLZb6JZoBLW48y1WlSML5W0dDdw/K553F4HosjgBSnujXaFdEKlx1fZ HJFlk5RI4+khI/ZU0gzIf9FbSwPulObZIkJ/MX7RHhJn3TtSOB7KTxYKH8SJ/hDqtFCi2g XriAwvbvt71g5BRuVo2C5ryf4QkHuTqP9tV+zbGNOYzYF2NvKczLJTNBblVimw== Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2025 15:47:35 +0200 From: Dragan Simic To: Diederik de Haas Cc: Tianling Shen , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heiko Stuebner , Jonas Karlman , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add devicetree for the FriendlyElec NanoPi R76S In-Reply-To: References: <20250922091509.2695565-1-cnsztl@gmail.com> <20250922091509.2695565-2-cnsztl@gmail.com> <1bb00ad6-ffe1-4783-909b-032dfb984180@gmail.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: dsimic@manjaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=dsimic@manjaro.org smtp.mailfrom=dsimic@manjaro.org Hello Diederik and Tianling, On 2025-09-27 09:37, Diederik de Haas wrote: > On Sat Sep 27, 2025 at 3:19 AM CEST, Tianling Shen wrote: >> On 2025/9/27 0:07, Diederik de Haas wrote: >>> It is recommended to use the labels in the schematics to define the >>> pinctl nodes (and thus their references). In quite a lot of cases >>> that's >>> indeed the case, but not for gpio-keys (USER_BUT) or these gpio-leds >>> pinctls. >> >> I cannot find any specific naming rules from the gpio-keys[1] and >> gpio-leds[2] bindings, did I miss any update? >> >> I think this naming matches the current practice at least in >> rockchip's >> dt tree. > > There is an unofficial rule/aim: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/5360173.ktpJ11cQ8Q@diego/ > But granted, there is 'some' inconsistency. > > And used in f.e. > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20250727144409.327740-4-jonas@kwiboo.se/ > > Where you can just copy the pinctrl labels from the dts[i] and paste > that in the schematic document and you're instantly at the right place. > Which is the exact purpose of that rule/aim. Is the schematic actually publicly available? I tried searching for it, but found nothing, unfortunately.