From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>,
chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
Andrey Skvortsov <andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/7] i2c: Introduce OF component probe function
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 11:37:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d0d07673-389c-49de-bdd1-4c5a697ec332@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241106093335.1582205-4-wenst@chromium.org>
Il 06/11/24 10:33, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> Some devices are designed and manufactured with some components having
> multiple drop-in replacement options. These components are often
> connected to the mainboard via ribbon cables, having the same signals
> and pin assignments across all options. These may include the display
> panel and touchscreen on laptops and tablets, and the trackpad on
> laptops. Sometimes which component option is used in a particular device
> can be detected by some firmware provided identifier, other times that
> information is not available, and the kernel has to try to probe each
> device.
>
> This change attempts to make the "probe each device" case cleaner. The
> current approach is to have all options added and enabled in the device
> tree. The kernel would then bind each device and run each driver's probe
> function. This works, but has been broken before due to the introduction
> of asynchronous probing, causing multiple instances requesting "shared"
> resources, such as pinmuxes, GPIO pins, interrupt lines, at the same
> time, with only one instance succeeding. Work arounds for these include
> moving the pinmux to the parent I2C controller, using GPIO hogs or
> pinmux settings to keep the GPIO pins in some fixed configuration, and
> requesting the interrupt line very late. Such configurations can be seen
> on the MT8183 Krane Chromebook tablets, and the Qualcomm sc8280xp-based
> Lenovo Thinkpad 13S.
>
> Instead of this delicate dance between drivers and device tree quirks,
> this change introduces a simple I2C component probe function. For a
> given class of devices on the same I2C bus, it will go through all of
> them, doing a simple I2C read transfer and see which one of them responds.
> It will then enable the device that responds.
>
> This requires some minor modifications in the existing device tree. The
> status for all the device nodes for the component options must be set
> to "fail-needs-probe". This makes it clear that some mechanism is
> needed to enable one of them, and also prevents the prober and device
> drivers running at the same time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-14 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-06 9:33 [PATCH v11 0/7] platform/chrome: Introduce DT hardware prober Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-11-06 9:33 ` [PATCH v11 1/7] of: dynamic: Add of_changeset_update_prop_string Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-11-14 10:37 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-11-06 9:33 ` [PATCH v11 2/7] of: base: Add for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix() Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-11-14 10:37 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-11-06 9:33 ` [PATCH v11 3/7] i2c: Introduce OF component probe function Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-11-14 10:37 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno [this message]
2024-11-06 9:33 ` [PATCH v11 4/7] i2c: of-prober: Add simple helpers for regulator support Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-11-14 10:37 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-11-06 9:33 ` [PATCH v11 5/7] i2c: of-prober: Add GPIO support to simple helpers Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-11-08 15:33 ` Andrey Skvortsov
2024-11-14 10:37 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-11-06 9:33 ` [PATCH v11 6/7] platform/chrome: Introduce device tree hardware prober Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-11-14 10:36 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-11-06 9:33 ` [PATCH v11 7/7] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8173-elm-hana: Mark touchscreens and trackpads as fail Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-11-14 10:36 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-11-25 8:01 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-11-25 9:52 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-11-27 3:49 ` [PATCH v11 0/7] platform/chrome: Introduce DT hardware prober Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-11-27 11:16 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-11-28 4:57 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d0d07673-389c-49de-bdd1-4c5a697ec332@collabora.com \
--to=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
--cc=wenst@chromium.org \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox