Re: [PATCH 06/14] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: smd-rpm: Use qcom,rpm-proc in example

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 05/06/2023 09:08, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> Use the new top-level rpm-proc node instead of having a dummy top-level
> /smd node that only contains the RPM but not other remote processors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml
> index c6930706bfa9..06e574239bd4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd-rpm.yaml
> @@ -120,10 +120,10 @@ examples:
>      #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>      #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>  
> -    smd {
> -        compatible = "qcom,smd";
> +    remoteproc-rpm {

remoteproc

> +        compatible = "qcom,msm8916-rpm-proc", "qcom,rpm-proc";
>  
> -        rpm {
> +        smd-edge {

What about binding updates?

Anyway, this should be squashed with previous one.

>              interrupts = <GIC_SPI 168 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>              qcom,ipc = <&apcs 8 0>;
>              qcom,smd-edge = <15>;
> 

Best regards,
Krzysztof