From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23E2C433FE for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 16:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B4B61038 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 16:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229594AbhJ1QeM (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:34:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59998 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229985AbhJ1QeL (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:34:11 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52c.google.com (mail-pg1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC1C9C061745; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:31:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id c4so6885391pgv.11; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:31:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2qpAsnBxzb0RZo6O+g4/E2Sye48fZtV2IzqgJ/O82Hs=; b=FMnNta75QMNAWIGl1B3HdzW6hSck9J6vNSUU8HT02cAterxi27aCSzs2z4GWQ7tUvx QgKsZD3l9Z/eG5mw7GOSGW6f/6+ma3wC+HP5EYKE6Wa7WsXWerXdElpYHYTwZisrnmEP iLh7EEQWfoW7GMAVsAfS4eZ6HcuRz8SlgXm1X8sOp8y3JoNo4q2kXwFgoHnE00Gnk0d1 zQeFSIh+iugbMqayQ74zgzUAc0aILr0AkAR10jGFXZYyfBVlATjGlSeZ/1s88NW7/vPB cIx13d2U4pfpRy4lwJIekA9xPwzaNNNz96EVm3FGynf8n1VJHszvkSOCze8EWhChze8q oVAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2qpAsnBxzb0RZo6O+g4/E2Sye48fZtV2IzqgJ/O82Hs=; b=bhJWJUDFvCqTQpndT2L6MW9oS4CVhtYakaV2j+vRl86YLCy7qSWnEPBYVE8qXRsxhr IG+apOKNEcQEH1kZTVIlQ16wQkEr0W87i/fMCh+JKSBNVv8vYmoGWKOSmEKHxhADxHwU EMYwd4B8IO2Ge1rP4WlZooTGGFVTvSsoedVv+GNfmomJDA0n6AcqXzPAn0Bwz95HgctC rYY/w25QoshwaSnHfdmiU5pxmSl7ZeODbncOOuL0QFNyBCwTprOFZrtNPw7UjQWs8FRj bhxgvl9PnTM7gRyS65tV6Qz8fjd2rEC9OjP7nA5uoA9tr9R8hewqiKAyOrTuNe4NfS/H ghFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5332Esx7otXLVfkxRFISJido9wGBdsE+kfF2wIJgPpy5dYN6T04h uk10VJPJiXQYekji8zzu48o9jz+NLXw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzzDlQaIDcmSkSn3lkrT3w/hge17S7j3EClN7/6pg8UyrZ2MUJ16hZ+JIQ+ZVr3CW3Dl6MZtg== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9250:0:b0:44c:27d1:7f0f with SMTP id 16-20020aa79250000000b0044c27d17f0fmr5245275pfp.41.1635438704432; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:31:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.67.48.245] ([192.19.223.252]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id mu11sm10274735pjb.20.2021.10.28.09.31.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:31:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: watchdog: convert Broadcom's WDT to the json-schema To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , Wim Van Sebroeck , Guenter Roeck , Rob Herring Cc: Florian Fainelli , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= References: <20211028093059.32535-1-zajec5@gmail.com> From: Florian Fainelli Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:31:42 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211028093059.32535-1-zajec5@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 10/28/21 2:30 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > From: Rafał Miłecki > > This helps validating DTS files. While at it also rename it to bcm63xx. > It's the first SoC with that hardware block and it's a naming schema > used for other Broadcom blocks. It's common for some (originally) > bcm63xx blocks to be reused in newer SoCs (like 7038 or 4908). > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki I would prefer you do not rename the binding especially as I am about to remove the bcm63xx_wdt.c driver, and so having a binding name that sort of matches the driver names makes it a lot easier to keep all of your eggs in the same basket. We can argue whether 63xx came before 7xxx in terms of time line, but that still does not justify the rename IMHO. I realized that we are missing a 7038 pattern in the MAINTAINERS file for the BCM7XXX entry, and that will be fixed shortly after sending this email. Please add Justin Chen (original author) and myself as maintainers for this binding. -- Florian