From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
erhard_f@mailbox.org, yinxiujiang@kylinos.cn
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] of: unittest: re-implement overlay tracking
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 21:39:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d1af4cc8-eb7e-ec83-0e15-11d3d4791a29@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220101033329.1277779-1-frowand.list@gmail.com>
Hi Erhard,
Can you please check whether this patch series fixes the shift-out-of-bounds
problem you reported?
-Frank
On 12/31/21 9:33 PM, frowand.list@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
>
> Some overlays are tracked when they are applied. The tracked overlays
> are later removed after the overlay tests are completed. The old
> implementation makes assumptions about the expected values for
> overlay changeset id created by the overlay apply which result
> in fragile code. The new code removes the assumptions.
>
> A symptom that exposes a problem with the tracking code is a
> warning "UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/of/unittest.c:1933:36",
> Kernel Version: 5.15-rc7, PPC-64, Talos II. This results from variable
> "id" value of -1 in the final line of of_unittest_untrack_overlay().
>
> The first patch in the series cleans up the inconsistent use of overlay
> changeset id and the obsolete overlay id. The id is a core concept in
> the overlay tracking that is re-implemented in the second patch in
> the series.
>
> Frank Rowand (2):
> of: unittest: change references to obsolete overlay id
> of: unittest: re-implement overlay tracking
>
> drivers/of/unittest.c | 154 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-01 3:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-01 3:33 [PATCH 0/2] of: unittest: re-implement overlay tracking frowand.list
2022-01-01 3:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] of: unittest: change references to obsolete overlay id frowand.list
2022-01-05 1:20 ` Rob Herring
2022-01-01 3:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] of: unittest: re-implement overlay tracking frowand.list
2022-01-05 1:22 ` Rob Herring
2022-01-01 3:39 ` Frank Rowand [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d1af4cc8-eb7e-ec83-0e15-11d3d4791a29@gmail.com \
--to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=erhard_f@mailbox.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=yinxiujiang@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).