From: skakit@codeaurora.org
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kgunda@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add PMIC peripherals for SC7280
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:48:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d1b8925da8197424d73cb9ac0a60b6ac@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YEumre0+KKxZ0p6Z@builder.lan>
Hi Bjorn,
On 2021-03-12 23:06, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu 11 Mar 04:40 CST 2021, satya priya wrote:
>
>> Add PM7325/PM8350C/PMK8350/PMR735A peripherals such as PON,
>> GPIOs, RTC and other PMIC infra modules for SC7280.
>>
>
> Overall this looks good, just two small things below.
>
>> Signed-off-by: satya priya <skakit@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> This patch depends on base DT and board files for SC7280 to merge
>> first
>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=487403
>>
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7325.dtsi | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pmk8350.dtsi | 104
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pmr735a.dtsi | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 8 +++
>> 5 files changed, 292 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7325.dtsi
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pmk8350.dtsi
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pmr735a.dtsi
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7325.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7325.dtsi
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..393b256
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7325.dtsi
>> @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>> +// Copyright (c) 2021, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>> +
>> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h>
>> +
>> +&spmi_bus {
>> + pm7325: pmic@1 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,pm7325", "qcom,spmi-pmic";
>> + reg = <0x1 SPMI_USID>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + pm7325_tz: temp-alarm@a00 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,spmi-temp-alarm";
>> + reg = <0xa00>;
>> + interrupts = <0x1 0xa 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>;
>> + #thermal-sensor-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + pm7325_gpios: gpios@8800 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,pm7325-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio";
>> + reg = <0x8800>;
>> + gpio-controller;
>> + gpio-ranges = <&pm7325_gpios 0 0 10>;
>> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
>> + interrupt-controller;
>> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +};
>> +
>> +&thermal_zones {
>> + pm7325_temp_alarm: pm7325_tz {
>
> '_' is not allowed to be used in node names, there's a few of these
> sprinkled through the patch. Please replace them with '-'.
>
Okay, will replace them.
>> + polling-delay-passive = <100>;
>> + polling-delay = <0>;
>> + thermal-governor = "step_wise";
>> + thermal-sensors = <&pm7325_tz>;
>> +
>> + trips {
>> + pm7325_trip0: trip0 {
>> + temperature = <95000>;
>> + hysteresis = <0>;
>> + type = "passive";
>> + };
>> +
>> + pm7325_trip1: trip1 {
>> + temperature = <115000>;
>> + hysteresis = <0>;
>> + type = "critical";
>> + };
>> +
>> + pm7325_trip2: trip2 {
>> + temperature = <145000>;
>> + hysteresis = <0>;
>> + type = "critical";
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +};
> [..]
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> index 8af6d77..25402d4 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> @@ -606,4 +606,12 @@
>> <GIC_PPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>,
>> <GIC_PPI 10 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
>> };
>> +
>> + thermal_zones: thermal-zones {
>> + };
>> };
>> +
>> +#include "pm7325.dtsi"
>> +#include "pm8350c.dtsi"
>> +#include "pmk8350.dtsi"
>> +#include "pmr735a.dtsi"
>
> Is there any particular reason for you including these at the end of
> sc7270.dtsi, rather than the top like we do in other platforms?
>
> Also, are all SC7280 devices always coming with this quartet? We've
> seen
> variations of this in the past and therefor typically include them from
> the board dts instead.
>
No specific reason, will add them in board dts file.
> Regards,
> Bjorn
Thanks,
Satya Priya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-22 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-11 10:40 [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add PMIC peripherals for SC7280 satya priya
2021-03-12 17:36 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-03-22 13:18 ` skakit [this message]
2021-03-12 20:40 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-03-22 13:20 ` skakit
2021-03-22 17:34 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-03-25 5:20 ` skakit
2021-03-30 18:19 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-03-12 20:47 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-03-22 14:05 ` skakit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d1b8925da8197424d73cb9ac0a60b6ac@codeaurora.org \
--to=skakit@codeaurora.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kgunda@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).