From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04776C0015E for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2023 11:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231273AbjGDLET (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2023 07:04:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60364 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230385AbjGDLES (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2023 07:04:18 -0400 Received: from madras.collabora.co.uk (madras.collabora.co.uk [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:25:2eeb:e5ab]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83E2EA3; Tue, 4 Jul 2023 04:04:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [IPV6:2001:b07:2ed:14ed:c5f8:7372:f042:90a2] (unknown [IPv6:2001:b07:2ed:14ed:c5f8:7372:f042:90a2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by madras.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3418266018CF; Tue, 4 Jul 2023 12:04:15 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1688468656; bh=g9fpBwzmmxZyfKY6sgTFm+2amQjq86tk1fvz17dQUl4=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=FRuatuby77tNcxZSxVDTH03bWGJwByCsT6Hb2gZ5y8G74zDCqn85uZL6x2NJRwmou 5deKeFimLsJ2sdt7eklWDWjz6/yvYhViFFxr4IFYHkuW7H9aR9HOe2cmCAoGHnpF+u 98fD4l2wK8X1AY6N8PY377oKuMvy07MPfzH8a6laSNAYFwxTfVY0yIEEEGYRDZv31R 0ZWtveLpALW6Mee55sfmlge99s/6tXjbfgyuNUBVP55Zg34jhL8aTWMCpEp3jl968w ZOXybuMCEAg4iQH1K4HmnDB+5Ns+cSbEQl0bNa9VaEIR2eh373l6jwN9TLDx7B6pIz b3daF4EMnxAsw== Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 13:04:12 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 07/10] soc: qcom: cpr: Use u64 for frequency Content-Language: en-US To: Konrad Dybcio , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Viresh Kumar , Nishanth Menon , Stephen Boyd , Niklas Cassel , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Conor Dooley Cc: Robert Marko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Jeffrey Hugo , Marijn Suijten References: <20230217-topic-cpr3h-v12-0-1a4d050e1e67@linaro.org> <20230217-topic-cpr3h-v12-7-1a4d050e1e67@linaro.org> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno In-Reply-To: <20230217-topic-cpr3h-v12-7-1a4d050e1e67@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Il 28/06/23 16:00, Konrad Dybcio ha scritto: > 32 bits is not enough for over-2.changeGHz frequencies. Move all variables > that operate on Hz to u64 to avoid overflows. > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno