devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
	paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@rivosinc.com,
	a.zummo@towertech.it, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org
Cc: daire.mcnamara@microchip.com, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] dt-bindings: clk: mpfs: add defines for two new clocks
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 13:47:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d49f38e7-5fd9-4e9a-cc20-2c839eb53712@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220411085916.941433-6-conor.dooley@microchip.com>

On 11/04/2022 10:59, Conor Dooley wrote:
> The RTC reference and MSSPLL were previously not documented or defined,
> as they were unused. Add their defines to the PolarFire SoC header.
> 
> Fixes: 2145bb687e3f ("dt-bindings: clk: microchip: Add Microchip PolarFire host binding")
> Reviewed-by: Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> ---
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h
> index 73f2a9324857..3cba46b9191f 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h
> @@ -1,15 +1,18 @@
>  /* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) */
>  /*
>   * Daire McNamara,<daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>
> - * Copyright (C) 2020 Microchip Technology Inc.  All rights reserved.
> + * Copyright (C) 2020-2022 Microchip Technology Inc.  All rights reserved.
>   */
>  
>  #ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_CLK_MICROCHIP_MPFS_H_
>  #define _DT_BINDINGS_CLK_MICROCHIP_MPFS_H_
>  
> +#define CLK_MSSPLL	34

You have some weird order here. Shouldn't it be under CLK_RTCREF?

> +
>  #define CLK_CPU		0
>  #define CLK_AXI		1
>  #define CLK_AHB		2
> +#define CLK_RTCREF	33
>  
>  #define CLK_ENVM	3
>  #define CLK_MAC0	4


Best regards,
Krzysztof

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-12 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-11  8:59 [PATCH v2 0/9] More PolarFire SoC Fixes for 5.18 Conor Dooley
2022-04-11  8:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] clk: microchip: mpfs: fix parents for FIC clocks Conor Dooley
2022-04-11  8:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] clk: microchip: mpfs: mark CLK_ATHENA as critical Conor Dooley
2022-04-11  8:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] riscv: dts: microchip: fix usage of fic clocks on mpfs Conor Dooley
2022-04-11  8:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] dt-bindings: clk: mpfs document msspll dri registers Conor Dooley
2022-04-12 11:46   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-11  8:59 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] dt-bindings: clk: mpfs: add defines for two new clocks Conor Dooley
2022-04-12 11:47   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2022-04-12 12:04     ` Conor.Dooley
2022-04-12 12:10       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-12 12:26         ` Conor.Dooley
2022-04-12 17:10           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-12 18:29             ` Conor Dooley
2022-04-13  6:44               ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-11  8:59 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] dt-bindings: rtc: add refclk to mpfs-rtc Conor Dooley
2022-04-12 11:48   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-12 11:50     ` Conor.Dooley
2022-04-11  8:59 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] clk: microchip: mpfs: re-parent the configurable clocks Conor Dooley
2022-04-12 19:14   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-11  8:59 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] clk: microchip: mpfs: add RTCREF clock control Conor Dooley
2022-04-11  8:59 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] riscv: dts: microchip: reparent mpfs clocks Conor Dooley
2022-04-11 13:25   ` Conor.Dooley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d49f38e7-5fd9-4e9a-cc20-2c839eb53712@linaro.org \
    --to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=daire.mcnamara@microchip.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).