* Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: health: maxim,max30102: add max30101
2024-03-21 18:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: health: maxim,max30102: add max30101 Javier Carrasco
@ 2024-03-22 2:09 ` Rob Herring
2024-03-24 13:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-03-24 13:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2024-03-22 2:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Javier Carrasco
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Matt Ranostay, devicetree, Jonathan Cameron,
Lars-Peter Clausen, Conor Dooley, linux-iio, linux-kernel
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 19:33:48 +0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> The Maxim max30101 irs the replacement for the max30105, which is no
> longer recommended for future designs.
>
> The max30101 does not require new properties, and it can be described
> with the existing ones for the max30105.
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/health/maxim,max30102.yaml | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: health: maxim,max30102: add max30101
2024-03-21 18:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: health: maxim,max30102: add max30101 Javier Carrasco
2024-03-22 2:09 ` Rob Herring
@ 2024-03-24 13:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-03-24 13:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2024-03-24 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Javier Carrasco
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, Matt Ranostay, linux-iio, devicetree, linux-kernel
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 19:33:48 +0100
Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Maxim max30101 irs the replacement for the max30105, which is no
is
> longer recommended for future designs.
>
> The max30101 does not require new properties, and it can be described
> with the existing ones for the max30105.
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/health/maxim,max30102.yaml | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/health/maxim,max30102.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/health/maxim,max30102.yaml
> index c13c10c8d65d..0e455809340f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/health/maxim,max30102.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/health/maxim,max30102.yaml
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/health/maxim,max30102.yaml#
> $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>
> -title: Maxim MAX30102 heart rate and pulse oximeter and MAX30105 particle-sensor
> +title: Maxim MAX30101/2 heart rate and pulse oximeter and MAX30105 particle-sensor
>
> maintainers:
> - Matt Ranostay <matt.ranostay@konsulko.com>
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ maintainers:
> properties:
> compatible:
> enum:
> + - maxim,max30101
> - maxim,max30102
> - maxim,max30105
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: health: maxim,max30102: add max30101
2024-03-21 18:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: health: maxim,max30102: add max30101 Javier Carrasco
2024-03-22 2:09 ` Rob Herring
2024-03-24 13:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
@ 2024-03-24 13:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-03-24 19:05 ` Javier Carrasco
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2024-03-24 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Javier Carrasco
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, Matt Ranostay, linux-iio, devicetree, linux-kernel
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 19:33:48 +0100
Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Maxim max30101 irs the replacement for the max30105, which is no
> longer recommended for future designs.
>
> The max30101 does not require new properties, and it can be described
> with the existing ones for the max30105.
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
Given there were no driver changes, is it fully compatible?
i.e. Should we have a fallback compatible here?
properties:
compatible:
oneOf:
- items:
- const: maxim,max30101
- const: maxim,max30105
- enum:
- maxim,max30102
- maxim,max30105
So that a DTS file could use
compatible = "maxim,max30101", "maxim,max30105"
and work with older kernels as well as new ones that understand the new ID?
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/health/maxim,max30102.yaml | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/health/maxim,max30102.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/health/maxim,max30102.yaml
> index c13c10c8d65d..0e455809340f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/health/maxim,max30102.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/health/maxim,max30102.yaml
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/health/maxim,max30102.yaml#
> $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>
> -title: Maxim MAX30102 heart rate and pulse oximeter and MAX30105 particle-sensor
> +title: Maxim MAX30101/2 heart rate and pulse oximeter and MAX30105 particle-sensor
>
> maintainers:
> - Matt Ranostay <matt.ranostay@konsulko.com>
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ maintainers:
> properties:
> compatible:
> enum:
> + - maxim,max30101
> - maxim,max30102
> - maxim,max30105
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: health: maxim,max30102: add max30101
2024-03-24 13:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
@ 2024-03-24 19:05 ` Javier Carrasco
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Javier Carrasco @ 2024-03-24 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Cameron
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, Matt Ranostay, linux-iio, devicetree, linux-kernel
On 3/24/24 14:46, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 19:33:48 +0100
> Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The Maxim max30101 irs the replacement for the max30105, which is no
>> longer recommended for future designs.
>>
>> The max30101 does not require new properties, and it can be described
>> with the existing ones for the max30105.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
>
> Given there were no driver changes, is it fully compatible?
> i.e. Should we have a fallback compatible here?
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> oneOf:
> - items:
> - const: maxim,max30101
> - const: maxim,max30105
> - enum:
> - maxim,max30102
> - maxim,max30105
>
> So that a DTS file could use
> compatible = "maxim,max30101", "maxim,max30105"
> and work with older kernels as well as new ones that understand the new ID?
>
According to the manufacturer, it is fully compatible, and apart from
the pinout, I could not find any difference beyond the device description.
I like the idea of having a fallback compatible for older kernels, so I
will add it to v2 as you suggested.
Thanks and best regards,
Javier Carrasco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread