Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] Introduce ExynosAutov920 SoC and SADK board

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 17/11/2023 11:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>> And dropped. You did not test it. Please read Samsung SoC maintainer
>>>>>> profile:
>>>>>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainers.html#arm-samsung-s3c-s5p-and-exynos-arm-architectures
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I also made announcements on the lists and on social.kernel.org. I don't
>>>>>> know where to announce it more...
>>>>>>
>>>>> To clarify, I dropped only DTS and kept bindings. Let me know if
>>>>> bindings are problematic here...
>>>>>
>>>>> I also repeated the announcement:
>>>>> https://social.kernel.org/notice/AbqJkj9gOZJ3sG8eCu
>>>>> Please share internally within Samsung, so there will be no surprises.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I already checked and there were no warnings or errors as shown below.
>>>>
>>>> Did I miss something??
>>> It's not what is written in maintainer profile. Where do you see the
>>> result of dtc W=1?
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, Krzysztof I miss W=1.
>>
>> I haven`t been active in mainline for a long time, so I`m missing out on 
>> a lot of things.
> 
> If you (plural you, Samsung) ever gave me an email address where I can
> send notifications I would gladly forward them to you.
> 
> Over the time I sent few of them, like the one about deprecation of
> platforms or changing some rules, feedback for common solution for
> minidump (to remind: Samsung decided to skip it so we go with Qualcomm
> idea and you will not be able to come with your own later) etc. I was
> even contacting some addresses in Samsung LSI, but there was never a
> response, except the one about minidump.
> 
> There was like never a chance to really get to Samsung, so sorry, now it
> is Samsung's fault it does not follow announcements.

Heh, my post on social.kernel.org is pinned (pinned!) for four months!
Four months is still not enough...

Best regards,
Krzysztof