Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,flexcom: Convert to json-schema

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 05/07/2022 14:00, Kavyasree.Kotagiri@microchip.com wrote:
>>> Convert the Atmel flexcom device tree bindings to json schema.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kavyasree Kotagiri <kavyasree.kotagiri@microchip.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> v5 -> v6:
>>>  - Removed spi node from example as suggested by Rob and
>>>    also pattern properties(spi dt-bindings conversion to yaml patch is under
>> review).
>>>    Once that is accepted, I will add back spi example through new patch.
>>>
>>> v4 -> v5:
>>>  - Fixed indentations.
>>>
>>> v3 -> v4:
>>>  - Corrected format of enum used for compatible string.
>>>
>>> v2 -> v3:
>>>  - used enum for compatible string.
>>>  - changed irq flag to IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH in example.
>>>  - fixed dtschema errors.
>>>
>>> v1 -> v2:
>>>  - Fix title.
>>>
>>>  .../bindings/mfd/atmel,flexcom.yaml           | 72 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-flexcom.txt | 63 ----------------
>>>  2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
>>>  create mode 100644
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,flexcom.yaml
>>
>> AFAICT it would be better to have it named atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml.
>>
> I see most of the yaml filenames have format of "vendor, function.yaml".For example: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/atmel,quadspi.yaml
> So, I think it is ok to use "atmel,flexcom.yaml".

Most files not correct. The recommended naming is based on first
compatible, so as Claudiu suggested.


Best regards,
Krzysztof