Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
	Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
	Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@gmail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: brcm,bcm59056: Convert to YAML
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 11:57:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d68e179d-73ac-48d0-acb1-aab644cdf8c6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250222-orthodox-black-mayfly-984ffc@krzk-bin>

On 22.02.2025 10:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 09:16:23PM +0100, Artur Weber wrote:
>> Convert devicetree bindings for the Broadcom BCM59056 PMU MFD from
>> TXT to YAML format. This patch does not change any functionality;
>> the bindings remain the same.
>>
>> The bindings have been split into two parts: the MFD binding and
>> a separate binding for the regulator node, to simplify the addition
>> of other models later (which have different regulators).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v5:
>> - Replace mfd/brcm,bcm59056.yaml with mfd/brcm,bcm590xx.yaml in
>>    regulator binding description
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>> - Made $ref use full schema path
>> - Cleaned up example
>> - Dropped regulator name list comment
>> - Changed description of regulator binding to mention BCM59056
>>    explicitly
>> - Changed "Power Management IC" to "Power Management Unit" to match
>>    official Broadcom naming
>> - Renamed mfd/brcm,bcm59056.yaml to mfd/brcm,bcm590xx.yaml
> 
> I don't understand why the name became "xx", instead of matching exactly
> compatible. It wasn't like this when I reviewed it last time and this is
> really unexpected change.
> 
> Please follow standard rules: filename must match compatible.

The change was mostly to make it more generic; it felt a bit weird that
the BCM59054 regulator binding (added in the next patch) referenced a
binding named after BCM59056. But if this is not a problem, and a
concrete model number is required (even if it is only one of the
supported devices), then I'll switch back to the bcm59056 name.

Best regards
Artur

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-22 10:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-21 20:16 [PATCH v5 0/9] mfd: bcm590xx: Add support for BCM59054 Artur Weber
2025-02-21 20:16 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: brcm,bcm59056: Convert to YAML Artur Weber
2025-02-22  9:43   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-22 10:57     ` Artur Weber [this message]
2025-02-21 20:16 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] dt-bindings: mfd: brcm,bcm59056: Add compatible for BCM59054 Artur Weber
2025-02-21 20:16 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] ARM: dts: Drop DTS for BCM59056 PMU Artur Weber
2025-02-21 20:16 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] mfd: bcm590xx: Add support for multiple device types + BCM59054 compatible Artur Weber
2025-02-21 20:16 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] mfd: bcm590xx: Add PMU ID/revision parsing function Artur Weber
2025-02-27 17:17   ` Lee Jones
2025-02-21 20:16 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] regulator: bcm590xx: Use dev_err_probe for regulator register error Artur Weber
2025-02-21 20:16 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] regulator: bcm590xx: Store regulator descriptions in table Artur Weber
2025-02-21 20:16 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] regulator: bcm590xx: Rename BCM59056-specific data as such Artur Weber
2025-02-21 20:16 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] regulator: bcm590xx: Add support for BCM59054 regulators Artur Weber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d68e179d-73ac-48d0-acb1-aab644cdf8c6@gmail.com \
    --to=aweber.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
    --cc=stano.jakubek@gmail.com \
    --cc=~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox