Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] add support MDP3 on MT8195 platform

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>]

Il 12/09/23 11:37, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 5:00 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Il 12/09/23 09:57, Moudy Ho ha scritto:
>>> Changes since v4:
>>> - Rebase on v6.6-rc1
>>> - Remove any unnecessary DTS settings.
>>> - Adjust the usage of MOD and clock in blending components.
>>>
>>> Changes since v3:
>>> - Depend on :
>>>     [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list/?series=719841
>>> - Suggested by Krzysztof, integrating all newly added bindings for
>>>     the mt8195 MDP3 into the file "mediatek,mt8195-mdp3.yaml".
>>> - Revise MDP3 nodes with generic names.
>>>
>>> Changes since v2:
>>> - Depend on :
>>>     [1] MMSYS/MUTEX: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=711592
>>>     [2] MDP3: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=711618
>>> - Suggested by Rob to revise MDP3 bindings to pass dtbs check
>>> - Add parallel paths feature.
>>> - Add blended components settings.
>>>
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> - Depend on :
>>>     [1] MDP3 : https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=698872
>>>     [2] MMSYS/MUTEX: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=684959
>>> - Fix compilation failure due to use of undeclared identifier in file "mtk-mdp3-cmdq.c"
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> This patch is used to add support for MDP3 on the MT8195 platform that
>>> contains more picture quality components, and can arrange more pipelines
>>> through two sets of MMSYS and MUTEX respectively.
>>>
>>> Moudy Ho (14):
>>>     arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8183: correct MDP3 DMA-related nodes
>>>     arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: add MDP3 nodes
>>
>> Please send the DTS patches separately, those go through a different maintainer.
> 
> I thought most people prefer the _full_ view in a patchset?
> 

Yeah but those going through a different maintainer makes it more straightforward
to pick; besides, essentially, you can also get a full view with dt-bindings
patches instead of devicetrees, as the latter are "constructed from" bindings
anyway.

Moreover, it would be definitely nice to add a link to the devicetree series
in the cover letter of this series, so that people *do* get a full overview
by checking both series :-)

Cheers!

>> P.S.: The dt-bindings patch can be sent inside of this series, please do that.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Angelo
>>
>>