From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Georgi Djakov <djakov@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] interconnect: qcom: let platforms declare their bugginess
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 11:52:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <da741f9e-d5ff-45d2-9b1e-7f15f71352a8@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DHB05UJMTAVN.17X2QI6XGHB37@fairphone.com>
On 3/24/26 1:14 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On Tue Mar 24, 2026 at 1:10 AM CET, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On MSM8974 programming some of the RPM resources results in the
>> "resource does not exist" messages from the firmware. This occurs even
>> with the downstream bus driver, which happily ignores the errors. My
>> assumption is that these resources existed in the earlier firmware
>> revisions but were later switched to be programmed differently (for the
>> later platforms corresponding nodes use qos.ap_owned, which prevents
>> those resources from being programmed.
>>
>> In preparation for conversion of the MSM8974 driver (which doesn't have
>> QoS code yet) to the main icc-rpm set of helpers, let the driver declare
>> that those -ENXIO errors must be ignored (for now). Later, when the QoS
>> programming is sorted out (and more interconnects are added to the DT),
>> this quirk might be removed.
>
> For reference, these are the errors I see on fairphone-fp2
>
> [ 5.534806] qcom_icc_rpm_smd_send mas 8 error -6
> [ 5.535010] qcom_icc_rpm_smd_send mas 8 error -6
> [ 5.535218] qcom_icc_rpm_smd_send slv 16 error -6
> [ 5.535445] qcom_icc_rpm_smd_send slv 16 error -6
I only checked these two, but 8994 (basically largely reused design
thought) sets them as AP owned intentionally
https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/android-msm-angler-3.10-nougat/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/msm8994-bus.dtsi
so I suppose the fix is to simply denote all of them as such and go on
with our life!
Konrad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-25 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-24 0:10 [PATCH v2 0/9] interconnect: qcom: let MSM8974 interconnect work again Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-24 0:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom,msm8974: drop bus clocks Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-24 0:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom,msm8974: use qcom,rpm-common Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-24 0:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] interconnect: qcom: drop unused is_on flag Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-24 9:40 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-03-24 0:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] interconnect: qcom: icc-rpm: allow overwriting get_bw callback Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-24 10:54 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-03-24 0:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] interconnect: qcom: define OCMEM bus resource Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-24 0:10 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] interconnect: qcom: let platforms declare their bugginess Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-24 12:14 ` Luca Weiss
2026-03-25 10:52 ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2026-03-24 0:10 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] interconnect: qcom: msm8974: switch to the main icc-rpm driver Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-24 0:10 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] interconnect: qcom: msm8974: expand DEFINE_QNODE macros Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-24 0:10 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] ARM: dts: qcom: msm8974: Drop RPM bus clocks Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-24 9:40 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-03-24 2:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] interconnect: qcom: let MSM8974 interconnect work again Alexandre Messier
2026-03-24 11:04 ` Luca Weiss
2026-03-24 11:07 ` Luca Weiss
2026-03-31 21:04 ` (subset) " Bjorn Andersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=da741f9e-d5ff-45d2-9b1e-7f15f71352a8@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=bmasney@redhat.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=djakov@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.weiss@fairphone.com \
--cc=masneyb@onstation.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox