From: "Vokáč Michal" <Michal.Vokac@ysoft.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
"linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH fbdev-for-next 2/2] video: ssd1307fb: Add support for the reset-active-low property
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 15:12:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <db9537dc-2ba5-b8fc-ae3c-7d85841b0797@ysoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bea0e9c.1c69fb81.1f3c8.be5a@mx.google.com>
On 12.11.2018 17:55, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 02:56:35PM +0000, Vokáč Michal wrote:
>> The SSD130x OLED display reset signal is active low. Now the reset
>> sequence is implemented in such a way that DTS authors are forced to
>> define the reset-gpios property with GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH to make the reset
>> work.
>>
>> Add the reset-active-low property so the signal is inverted once again
>> and the GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW work as expected.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Vokáč <michal.vokac@ysoft.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
>> index e7ae135..790f1c4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
>> @@ -608,6 +608,7 @@ static int ssd1307fb_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> struct fb_deferred_io *ssd1307fb_defio;
>> u32 vmem_size;
>> struct ssd1307fb_par *par;
>> + bool reset_active_low;
>> u8 *vmem;
>> int ret;
>>
>> @@ -671,6 +672,7 @@ static int ssd1307fb_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> par->com_seq = of_property_read_bool(node, "solomon,com-seq");
>> par->com_lrremap = of_property_read_bool(node, "solomon,com-lrremap");
>> par->com_invdir = of_property_read_bool(node, "solomon,com-invdir");
>> + reset_active_low = of_property_read_bool(node, "reset-active-low");
>>
>> par->contrast = 127;
>> par->vcomh = par->device_info->default_vcomh;
>> @@ -728,9 +730,9 @@ static int ssd1307fb_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>
>> if (par->reset) {
>> /* Reset the screen */
>> - gpiod_set_value_cansleep(par->reset, 0);
>> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(par->reset, reset_active_low);
>> udelay(4);
>> - gpiod_set_value_cansleep(par->reset, 1);
>> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(par->reset, !reset_active_low);
>
> I think you and whomever wrote the original code are misinterpretting
> how the gpiod API works. 1 means make the signal active and this case
> active is low.
I totally agree and I think I understand that correctly.
> It is strange, but does mean a reset sequence should always be set to a
> 1 and then a 0 and it will work with either polarity in the DT.
I agree the reset should be done as a 0 -> 1 -> 0 sequence and that should
just work. The problem is it is implemented vice versa and so it works only
if you have GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH in DT for a signal that is actually active low.
And what it actually does is that it holds the controller in reset since
the GPIO is successfully acquired (because of GPIOD_OUT_LOW here [1]) and
later on it only releases the reset.
As a DT author I would like to somehow clearly state that the OLED display
uses active low reset in my DT.
My first attempt to fix this was to change the reset sequence [2].
It was applied and then reverted as it is not backward compatible with
deployed DTB files [3].
[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.20-rc3/source/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c#L570
[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10617729/
[3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10617731/
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-19 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-02 14:56 [PATCH fbdev-for-next 1/2] dt-bindings: display: ssd1307fb: Add reset-active-low property Vokáč Michal
2018-11-02 14:56 ` [PATCH fbdev-for-next 2/2] video: ssd1307fb: Add support for the " Vokáč Michal
2018-11-12 16:55 ` Rob Herring
2018-11-19 15:12 ` Vokáč Michal [this message]
2018-11-19 22:32 ` Rob Herring
2018-11-26 12:25 ` Vokáč Michal
2018-11-26 13:49 ` Rob Herring
2018-11-26 14:20 ` Vokáč Michal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=db9537dc-2ba5-b8fc-ae3c-7d85841b0797@ysoft.com \
--to=michal.vokac@ysoft.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jsarha@ti.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).