From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] J-Core timer support
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 20:18:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dbc37a62-76c7-ec6f-1e80-155359dcb968@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610202005150.4938@nanos>
On 20/10/2016 20:07, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Daniel,
>>
>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Rich Felker wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:32:40AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>> Unfortunately it won't happen. v4.9-rc1 is already out. The driver will be
>>>> in v4.10.
>>>>
>>>> If you wanted patches merged for v4.9, they should have been merged in the
>>>> downstream tree before v4.8-rc5, so they hit the upstream tree for v4.9's merge
>>>> window.
>>>
>>> I've been trying to get what's essentially the same patch merged since
>>> before the 4.8 merge window. I would be more understanding if this
>>> were something new that's not upstream, but broken support for the
>>> hardware (that, from a user perspective, is a bug, since they can
>>> select the target but then it doesn't boot) has already been in one
>>> release due to missing core drivers, and the irq patches have already
>>> been merged in this release (post-rc1 even).
>>
>> It's hardware enablement and not a new feature, so it's fine to merge it
>> now. I'll pick it up later tonight.
>
> Daniel, it's the top two commits in your 4.10 branch. So it's not a big
> deal to zap them.
Yes, sure. No problem.
Thanks!
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-20 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-13 21:51 [PATCH v9 0/2] J-Core timer support Rich Felker
2016-10-13 21:51 ` [PATCH v9 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Rich Felker
2016-10-13 21:51 ` [PATCH v9 1/2] of: add J-Core timer bindings Rich Felker
2016-10-17 9:30 ` [PATCH v9 0/2] J-Core timer support Daniel Lezcano
2016-10-20 1:22 ` Rich Felker
2016-10-20 7:32 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-10-20 15:15 ` Rich Felker
2016-10-20 17:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-20 18:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-20 18:18 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2016-10-20 18:29 ` Rich Felker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dbc37a62-76c7-ec6f-1e80-155359dcb968@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).